Durham Dispatch

The people of NC WARN are deeply saddened by the unprecedented suffering across states devastated by Hurricane Helene. We applaud the courageous dedication of utility workers, FEMA and all those at the center of the recovery efforts. We also sympathize with the many North Carolinians still out of their homes six years after Hurricane Matthew, and Florence earlier, devastated eastern NC – and our concern is deepened by scientists’ warning of even stronger storms to come. At long last, North Carolina leaders must demand and facilitate an open discussion about the transition to generating and storing solar power where electricity is being used – particularly on the vast, untapped resource provided by roofs, parking areas and contaminated land. Such local solar-plus-storage (SPS) is the fastest, cheapest and fairest way to phase out climate-wrecking fossil fuels. And ramping up SPS would greatly reduce the reliance on the transmission infrastructure that’s increasingly vulnerable to climate disasters and acts of malice [ 1 ]. Since 2017, NC WARN engineers have been demonstrating to Duke Energy executives and state regulators that SPS can and must become a central part of the urgent effort to get off fossil fuels [ 2 ]. Our new Sharing Solar proposal and statewide campaign highlight the multiple resiliency benefits of a local SPS approach – such as keeping emergency facilities and shelters operable when power lines go down [ 3 ]. BLOCKING THE WAY Tragically, Duke’s leaders and state regulators keep undermining the state’s rooftop solar industry while greatly expanding the use of fracked fossil gas – the very methane that scientists increasingly warn is a key driver of global heating [ 4 ]. Ironically, Duke Energy leaders and allies want to spend billions of customer dollars to build the very same, vulnerable power lines, towers and transformers across eastern NC – the state’s most frequent hurricane target and the same underserved communities that blocked Duke’s $8 billion Atlantic Coast gas Pipeline in 2020. Climate-worsened hurricanes such as Helene are exactly why a world-leading climate polluter like Duke Energy cannot be allowed to continue dictating North Carolina’s path forward. The state’s rooftop solar companies, currently reeling from Duke and regulators’ attack on net metering, could be the key to expanding local solar right away – beginning with emergency facilities, hospitals, and shelters. Along with halting the expansion of methane gas, North Carolina could finally begin helping to slow the climate crisis while building communities that can better withstand the effects of disasters like Helene. Our sympathies are with all the people who are hurting and we remain determined to help turn the tide so that North Carolina finally begins to help slow the global climate emergency. This article was published first by NC WARN . Work Cited “Sharing Solar Issue Brief #1 : How Does It Improve Resiliency?" NC WARN , 18 Oct. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/sharing-solar-resiliency . Warren, Jim. “Local Solar & Batteries Can Rapidly Replace Fossil Fuel Electricity, Save 10s of Billions, Create 1000s of Jobs Across North Carolina, Says Energy Engineer.” NC WARN , 14 Sept. 2018, www.ncwarn.org/2017/08/local-solar-batteries-can-rapidly-replace-fossil-fuel-electricity-in-nc . “The Quickest, Most Affordable Way to Tackle the Climate Crisis and Cut Power Bills.” NC WARN , 7 Oct. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/sharing-solar-summ . Friedlander, Blaine. “Liquefied Natural Gas Carbon Footprint Is Worse Than Coal.” Cornell Chronicle , 3 Oct. 2024, news.cornell.edu/stories/2024/10/liquefied-natural-gas-carbon-footprint-worse-coal .

On November 12th, the Durham County Board of Commissioners postponed a vote on a new training facility proposed by the Sheriff’s Office. The $18 million project would transform an existing firing range on Electra Road. The commission delayed discussion of the planned facility to a January 6th work session after the project was strongly criticized as a "cop city" by Triangle Stop Cop City, Durham Beyond Policing, and other organizations.   Between 30 and 40 residents attended Tuesday’s meeting to oppose the proposed training facility. The group was mobilized to county chambers by a November 11th Instagram post that got 1,400 likes, viral by the standards of Durham politics [ 1 ]. For comparison, mayor Leonardo Williams received 500 likes for an Instagram post about his speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention [ 2 ].   Critics of the Electra Road project secured a partial victory about an hour into the meeting when board chair Nida Allam removed the relevant vote from the consent agenda [ 3, timestamp 1:19:00 ].   Allam also said, “For this item, I’ll request that sheriff Birkhead and attorney Lovelace bring this back to a work session again for further discussion and an opportunity for more information sharing with the community and the board” [ 3, timestamp 1:22:00 ].   The activists didn’t stir until Allam said, “Since this item is not on the agenda for approval anymore, there is not a period for public comment” [ 3, timestamp 1:26:00 ]. Existing firing range on Electra Road. Image credit: CBS17.   At this point, people who'd come expecting to speak disrupted the meeting to argue with Allam and commissioner Nimasheena Burns. The board eventually gave a one-minute time slot to anyone who wanted to make a public comment.   Before the short speeches began, Burns offered her view of the issue. She suggested that Durham County law enforcement spending, including the $18 million project, has gotten too much scrutiny.   “A couple months ago, when it was time to do the hearing for this property, everybody voted on that public hearing,” said Burns. Later she continued, “And so today, something we’ve gone over three times, we’re pulling it [from the consent agenda]” [ 3, timestamp 1:24:00 ].   During arguments with audience members, Allam claimed that planning for the training facility had been public and transparent. She said, “This is an item that has been discussed several, several times. This isn’t an item that is being put on the agenda without discussion” [ 3, timestamp 1:32:00 ].   The News and Observer  wrote that the Electra Road project had been “long-planned” since “at least 2020” [ 4 ]. In a paragraph describing plans for the facility as long-standing and well-known, the article provided a link to the Durham County Capital Improvement Plan. The site does include an entry for a “Sheriff Firing Range Upgrade” in FY2022-23 with a cost of $12 million [ 5, pg. 3, Goal 3 ]. However, the name, year, and cost are all misleading or incorrect. The News and Observer  quoted sheriff Clarence Birkhead who wished residents had raised their concerns before “the eleventh hour” and also noted that “there are no bathrooms” at the existing site. The firing range has been in use for forty years. CBS17  repeated a Sheriff's Office claim that the project had been ongoing since 2016, but provided no evidence [ 6 ]. Rendering of proposed training facility. Image credit: CBS17 Political and media spin aside, public scrutiny and awareness of the proposed training facility was nonexistent before Tuesday’s protest. A major reason is that there wasn’t a single article about the project in any newspaper prior to November 12th. Given that fact, it’s a small miracle that community organizations managed to find Tuesday’s vote, understand its significance, mobilize a large number of people, and successfully delay the Electra Road project.   Although the $18 million facility has been postponed, a majority of commissioners would likely vote in favor if given the chance [ 3, timestamp 1:27:00 ]. With board approval, an existing firing range on Electra Road would be transformed into “a 10,000 square foot building with classrooms, bathrooms and magazine storage. The already-existing firing range on the property would be renovated” [ 6 ].   Public comment began ninety minutes into Tuesday’s meeting. Every speaker was opposed to the proposed training facility. Residents called project a “cop city”, criticized the conduct of Durham's police, questioned the institution of law enforcement, and called for more social spending of various kinds. A member of Durham’s HEART teams, which were praised by many residents during public comments. Image credit: News and Observer. A few quotes from these remarks are provided below:   Carrie Medlin:   “I love Durham. Since I moved to Durham, the following people have been killed by law enforcement officers: Jesus Huerta, Mathew McCain, Raphael Bennett, Terry Lee, La’Vonte Trevon Biggs, Dennis McMurray, Frank Clark, Uniece Glenae Fennell, Kenneth Bailey Jr., James Earl Staton Jr., Jean Carolyn McGirt, Shaun Jeffrey Christy, Deshawn Evans, Ondrae Hutchinson, Darrell Kersey, Brittany Kittrell, Charles Walker Piquet, Stephanie Wilson, Raishawn Jones… [timer rings] … Erick Cano-Castellanos” [ 3, timestamp 1:42:00 ].   Maxine Eloi:   “I care deeply about the city of Durham and the people here and believe that we all deserve to live a joyful, abundant, and free life. The idea of the police began as a force to capture enslaved people and it has yet to cut this root out. That is the core of what the police stand for” [ 3, timestamp 2:00:00 ].   Elizabeth Arandt:   “I’m speaking out in opposition to the sheriff’s proposed training facility as well. I believe it’s absolutely vital for the safety, well-being, and basic human rights of Durham citizens to reject this proposal for a new cop city. This facility would serve to further militarize our police force and take essential funds away from meaningful public services” [ 3, timestamp 2:13:00 ].   Work Cited   1.     “Post by Triangle Cop City and others.” Instagram , 11 Nov. 2024, www.instagram.com/trianglestopcopcity/p/DCPSES_vo9v . 2.     “Post by Leonardo Williams and others.” Instagram , 23 Aug. 2024, www.instagram.com/p/C_CHenVu4hm . 3.     “Durham County Board of Commissioners Meeting.”  YouTube , 13 Nov. 2024,  www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKfRfeEwpMs . 4.     Moore, Mary Helen. “Group Protests $18M Durham Sheriff’s Office Training Facility, Linking It to ‘Cop City.’” News and Observer , 15 Nov. 2024, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article295464889.html . 5. “Capital Improvement Plan.” Durham County NC Transparency Portal , www.data-dconc.org/dashboards/capital-improvement-plan . 6.    Bokun, Ben. “‘Cop City’: Durham County tables plan to build $16M sheriff’s training facility after protests”  CBS17 , 15 Nov. 2024,  www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/cop-city-durham-county-tables-plan-to-build-multi-million-dollar-sheriffs-training-facility-after-protests .

$1.50 and Amazon Prime is not a gift or a raise. It is a small part of what Amazon should have been paying us! Amazon has only raised pay a total of $2.50 over the last three years, less than the cost of living has increased. You’ve seen how much more you have to spend on groceries, how much your landlord has raised the rent. $1.50 does not even begin to cover it. An RDU1 associate will now start at $18 an hour, less than half of the minimum living wage for an adult with a child in the Raleigh area - $41.23. Even a single adult must make $25.30 an hour to have a living wage. If you are still not making a living wage, a pay increase is not a raise, it is a joke! The only reason Amazon has even made these meager pay increases is that they are scared of us unionizing. They made the starting wage $15 an hour in 2018 because they felt threatened by the Fight for Fifteen movement. This time they are frightened by CAUSE and all the other unionization efforts throughout the world. Do not get it backwards: Amazon throwing out extra pennies in raises is proof that we need a union more than ever! It is proof that us coming together can bring real change, not pocket change! UPS warehouse workers recently won record wage increases, going from $15.50 an hour to $21 an hour and guaranteed additional raises that amount to a $10.25 an hour increase over five years. UPS workers have better wages and benefits because workers put pressure on the company while the Teamsters union bargained with the company. Their union-run healthcare, TeamCare, has a $0 monthly payment, $100 deductible, out of pocket max of $1,000, as well as full dental, vision, and disability coverage. We can fight for what we deserve with CAUSE! Amazon gave us a crumb of the $574 billion they made last year so they can say we don't need a union. In 2022 and 2023 Amazon paid an outside group of people over $14 million to pretend to be co-workers and bad mouth unions because they are afraid of the power of organized workers. Amazon is afraid because it knows that workers united in the CAUSE can win far higher wages and better working conditions and benefits if we come together. The first step? Sign a union authorization card and get your friends and family to sign too! This article was first published by CAUSE .

Speaker from NC Environmental Justice Network On Tuesday evening, about a hundred people gathered in front of the Durham County Courthouse to protest the climate policies of Duke Energy and the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC). Speakers at the rally criticized the utility's plans for 8.9 gigawatts (GW) of new fracked gas plants in speeches. At seven o’clock, the crowd went into the courthouse for an NCUC public hearing.   According to state law HB951, Duke Energy and the NCUC must eliminate carbon dioxide (CO2) in the utility sector by 2050. In apparent defiance, the utility has planned for 8.9 GW of new fracked gas plants by 2035 [ 1 ]. Duke Energy’s promise that new fracked gas plants would be converted to hydrogen fuel in the 2040s has been viewed with skepticism by critics. CT and CC technologies are compatible with fracked gas. Image credit: Duke Energy, “IRP Load Growth Fact Sheet” The “Rally Against the Duke Energy Carbon Plan” featured speeches from Dr. Crystal Cavalier-Keck from 7 Directions of Service, Caroline Armijo of The Lilies Project, Bobby Jones of Down East Coal Ash, and others. The event was MC-ed by Karen Bearden from 350 Triangle.   "The Dan and Roanoke River watersheds are the only places on earth where you can find the Roanoke Logperch and James Spinymussel,” said Cavalier-Keck. “These and other endemic species will cease to exist if we don’t protect them from harm like Duke’s proposed methane-fracked gas build outs in Rockingham, Caswell, and Person Counties.”   People at Tuesday’s rally debated the size of Duke Energy’s fracked gas expansion, which is complex and poorly covered by media. Some saw a small victory since as recently as 2022 Duke Energy was planning an even-larger fracked gas expansion of 11.7 GW [ 2, pg. 86, table E-84 ]. Others worried that the reduction to 8.9 GW by 2035 not fully understood, and could be a trick to push through other negative policies. “We're here because we recognize that the climate change emergency is upon us. We're not talking about climate change coming tomorrow or in ten years, it's already here," said one speaker, "We’re here because we believe that not one community can be regarded as disposable. We believe that for our communities in eastern North Carolina… for our workers here in Durham County…and for people overseas.”   Twelve environmental groups planned the rally together including Climate Action NC, NC Black Alliance, and Sunrise Movement Durham Hub. Organizers were pleased that the event included both “climate change” and “environmental justice” groups, which often divide on lines of race and class.   During the “Rally Against the Duke Energy Carbon Plan”, speakers accused Duke Energy of pushing fracked gas under false pretenses. The power plants have a lifespan of 30 to 40 years. Green groups fear that plans for 8.9 GW of fracked gas would enable Duke Energy to emit CO2 far past the 2050 deadline ordered by HB951.   The utility has promised to convert new fracked gas plants to green hydrogen in the 2040s, but the technology for a full transition to hydrogen fuel does not exist. There are no 100 percent hydrogen-fired plants in the world, a fact often pointed out at Tuesday's rally, making Duke Energy’s proposal some combination of dubious, reckless, or fraudulent. Speech by Caroline Armijo from The Lilies Project State law requires the NCUC to revise the carbon plan every two years. Many of the green groups in front of the courthouse had held similar events for public hearings in 2022, but the NCUC still went ahead and approved plans for two GW of new fracked gas plants [ 3 ]. That led many environmentalists to view the regulator as a rubber-stamp for Duke Energy.   The activist’s speeches ended at seven o’clock and people lined up to get into the courthouse. Some attendees didn’t plan to stay for long. When NCUC member Floyd McKissick opened the proceedings, disruptions began almost immediately. The first to stand up and loudly denounce the NCUC was Bobby Jones from Down East Coal Ash Environmental and Social Justice Coalition.   “This hearing is a farce! We already told you what you need to do last time, and you betrayed us! I’m walking out, and we’ll be holding a real hearing outside for anyone that wants to join.” NCUC member Floyd McKissick chaired Tuesday’s hearing. Image credit: NC Legislature   McKissick soothed the crowd, assuring them that public testimony was taken seriously by the NCUC. There were two more protests and walkouts in the early minutes of the hearing. By the time calm was restored, a dozen people had left the courtroom to go outside for a “People’s Hearing” led by Jodi Lasseter of NC Climate Justice Collective.   Environmentalists have good reason for cynicism toward the NCUC. On paper, the regulator oversees Duke Energy, with full powers to apply state laws to the private monopoly. While accurate, that picture leaves out Duke Energy’s spectacular influence over state politics which the utility has used to shape energy laws and ensure a compliant NCUC.   In the last two years, the NCUC has rubber-stamped four of Duke Energy’s requests – the last carbon plan docket in December 2022, a rooftop solar case in March 2023, as well as two huge rate hikes in August and December 2023. “Rally Against the Duke Energy Carbon Plan” on April 30, 2024. Image credit: NCCJC When the interruptions petered out, McKissick began to call up attendees to give testimony on the carbon plan. Speech after speech requested the same policies – speed up closure of coal plants, scrap plans for new fracked gas, and move toward a renewable grid based on local solar, battery storage, and wind power.   McKissick listened to the comments politely, as he had during the 2022 hearings. A bailiff watched the crowd carefully, on guard for more mischief.   Outside at the “People’s Hearing”, participants passed around a microphone and talked about Duke Energy and the NCUC. One member, Steph Gans, said the whole situation reminded her of her work as a therapist. She recalled clients who were cigarette smokers tell her about the emotional agony of knowing they’d paid thousands of dollars for a product that later gave them cancer or heart attacks.   “It’s a little different with Duke Energy. They come and tell us that they’re going to ruin our communities and destroy our environment. And the kicker is, we have to pay for it”. Flooding in Fair Bluff, NC caused by Hurricane Matthew in 2016. Two years later, the town was hit by Hurricane Florence. Image credit: The Guardian Work Cited   1.    Duke Energy Corporation.  Supplemental Updates to Duke Energy’s Resource Plan . season-01 2024,  www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/our-company/carolinas-resource-plan/january-24-fact-sheet.pdf?rev=8e61a3e3e8c844daaf4f2d5b6635c687 .  2.    “Carolinas Carbon Plan, ‘Quantitative Analysis.’”  NC Utilities Commission , 16 May 2022,  starw1.ncuc.gov/NCUC/ViewFile.aspx?Id=bad82411-63e7-4553-9c0c-18a8f671773d . 3.    Clingman, Alex. “NC Utilities Commission’s Carbon Plan Order.”  NC Sustainable Energy Association , 6 Feb. 2023,  energync.org/nc-utilities-commissions-2022-carbon-plan-order .

On November 9th, a wide array of labor and political groups held an organizing fair in Moore Square. Groups such as Raleigh Mutual Aid Hub, Jewish Voices for Peace, and Southern Workers Assembly set up tables to recruit members, promote initiatives, and pass out literature. The organizers said they hoped to demonstrate that, in the aftermath of a disastrous election, there are still many opportunities to build movements for labor rights, social justice, and international peace.   “We have power, we just have to be organized and conscious”, said Jody, a member of the IBEW union, “This event is important because it is a first step towards realizing the power we can only claim if we get organized.”   Around two hundred people came to downtown Raleigh for the organizing fair. Among the many labor groups with booths was CAUSE, a nascent union at the RDU1 warehouse in Garner, a town just south of Raleigh. CAUSE workers launched a union drive in September 2024 after years of building support within their Amazon fulfillment center. As of early October, the union said that “hundreds” of workers have signed union cards [ 1 ]. Less than three percent of North Carolina workers belong to a trade union, which is quite low even by U.S. standards. During Saturday's event, speakers from North Carolina Triangle Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) occasionally addressed the crowd.   “Our work begins with an acknowledgement of where we are”, said Mika, a DSA member, “We stand at the precipice of a fascist movement taking office, wielding the tools that the Democratic Party build and expanded for them.”   Political groups opposed to Donald Trump and the Republican Party have labelled them as fascist in reference to the regimes of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. A major aspect of fascism in these governments was state dominance over the business community. The only legislative achievement of Trump’s first term was a major tax cut for large corporations. It is unclear whether the Republicans would seek to break out of their subservient relationship with the business community over the next four years.   Meals for the Masses, a left-wing community kitchen, recruited volunteers at the organizing fair. The group serves free meals “no questions asked” every Sunday in Moore Square, and then turns the dinners into educational sessions on topics like “the backwards and hostile laws that the city of Raleigh imposes on the unhoused community” [ 2 ]. Around 1,400 Triangle residents were unhoused in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and other sources [ 3 ]. Activism and symbolism related to Palestine was widespread at Saturday’s event. Groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace, Healthcare Workers for Palestine, Palestinian Youth Movement, and others attended. Countless people wore keffiyehs and many booths were decorated with watermelons or other pro-Palestine imagery. Several tables were draped with Lebanese flags to protest U.S. support for Israel’s fourth invasion of Lebanon since 1978 [ 4 ].   DSA used the organizing fair to promote the “No Appetite for Apartheid” campaign, which asks local businesses to boycott Israeli goods. The initiative does not distinguish between goods made in Israel proper versus those made in illegal West Bank settlements. According to a DSA pamphlet, sixteen Triangle businesses have pledged their support for the campaign.   The third speaker at Saturday's event promoted a campaign against Gateway Women’s Care, an anti-abortion group with a Raleigh location. Gateway’s website offers “free, confidential pregnancy and sexual health services”, but reproductive rights groups have found that the organization has said it wants “women to choose life for themselves and their unborn child” and has called the communities where it operates “sexually broken and abortion-minded” [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ].   “We have been working on a campaign against anti-abortion centers over the last few years”, said the speaker for the anti-Gateway campaign, “We’ve been picketing Gateway Women’s Care on Hillsborough Street … to put pressure on the landlords [Ted and Pam Van Dyk] not to renew their lease. We have a petition going and have a picket this Friday at 1 p.m.” The organizing fair included more than a half-dozen groups that identify as socialist, anarchist, or communist, an unusual sight even the relatively progressive Triangle. To select at random, one of these was the Durham chapter of the Black Rose anarchists. The group has a moderate following on Instagram and a Linktree that spotlights a study group and recommends a 75-page program called “Turning the Tide”.   The Triangle chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), another group at Saturday’s event, has been more public facing and places strong emphasis on U.S. foreign policy. PSL activists have played an important role in frequent ceasefire rallies in Moore Square that tend to attract hundreds of people. In November 2024, the group raised money for Cuban relief at Mi Barrio café in Durham. The event raised $2,000 that PSL said, “will provide life-saving materials such as food, medicine and generators which are blocked from entering Cuba by the U.S. blockade” [ 8 ].   ---   At the Martin-Blount intersection, entirely outside the auspices of the organizing fair, a local chapter of the Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge (ISUPK) had set up a stage. The group's actions were a depressing reminder of what happens when politically minded people are not organized in a constructive way. An ISUPK speaker spewed hate against the LGBT community and also mixed in rambling thoughts about actual problems like white supremacy, gang violence, and the war on drugs. ISUPK has been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.   ---   The organizing fair offered Triangle residents ways to join movements for labor rights, social justice, international peace, and other issues. The progressive and leftist groups that staged the event said they hoped to offer people productive ways to channel their fear and frustration in the aftermath of right-wing election victories. Strong attendance at Saturday's event suggested that there are many Triangle activists prepared to move forward with an optimism of the will. Work Cited Geller, Lena. “At an Amazon Warehouse in Garner, a Card-Signing Campaign Is Underway.” INDY Week , 18 Oct. 2024, indyweek.com/news/wake/at-an-amazon-warehouse-in-garner-a-card-signing-campaign-is-underway . "Meals for the Masses post on November 1". Instagram . www.instagram.com/p/DB1aVckJnee/?hl=en&img_index=1 . Eanes, Zachery. “What’s Behind a Surprising Drop in Homelessness Numbers in the Triangle.” Axios , 3 Nov. 2023, www.axios.com/local/raleigh/2023/11/03/behind-the-drop-in-homelessness-numbers-in-raleigh-durham . Bigg, Matthew. “Israel Has Invaded Lebanon Three Times Before. Here’s a Closer Look.” New York Times , 1 Oct. 2024, www.nytimes.com/2024/10/01/world/middleeast/israel-lebanon-invasions-history.html . "Website homepage". Gateway Women’s Care. https://gatewaywomens.care . “Gateway Womens Care - Full Filing- Nonprofit Explorer.” ProPublica , https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/581584775/202342089349301154/full . "Gateway Women’s Care (Accredited Organization Profile)" ECFA . www.ecfa.org/MemberProfile.aspx?ID=4129 . "Triangle PSL post on November 10". Instagram . www.instagram.com/p/DCMb1GcR-FD/?hl=en&img_index=1 .

By Victor Urquiza Community members, organizers, and UFE staff join the prayer ceremony with the Apache Stronghold at the Avila Center for Community Leadership. Photo credit: Apache Stronghold On September 4th, 2024, United for a Fair Economy had the incredible privilege of hosting the Apache Stronghold in Durham, North Carolina on their national prayer journey leading up to their Supreme Court fight on September 11th. A History of Theft, Broken Promises and Mass Suffering Ever since the colonial project of the United States began over 400 years ago, indigenous nations and tribes have been subjected to genocidal practices including land theft and forced displacement, murder, sexual violence, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, racism and broken treaties.  These injustices have been met with many forms of resistance. Since 1492 to the present day, Native people in the Americas have fought back against colonialism and capitalism. One of the most recent examples of this 400 year long resistance is within the Apache Stronghold.  Photo credit: Robin Silver Photography The Fight To Save Chí’chil Biłdagoteel (Oak Flat) Chí’chil Biłdagoteel – “Oak Flat” in English – is sacred ceremonial ground, held by several Apache tribes in Arizona. Since the early 2000s, Apache tribes and community support groups have fought against Resolution Copper, a multinational mining company, which has been attempting to steal the land of Oak Flat to gain access to one of the biggest copper deposits in the country. For decades, the U.S. government had prohibited mining operations on this land because of its sacred value to several native groups in the Southwest. This all changed when, in 2014, a last minute change to a defense bill directed the government to transfer the Oak Flats land to Resolution Copper. This bill included plans to construct a mine that will obliterate the sacred site in a nearly 2-mile-wide, 1,100-foot-deep crater. In response, a coalition of Apache tribes, non-Apache native groups and non-native organizations came together to create the Apache Stronghold. They sued the U.S. government for this blatant attack on religious freedom and indigenous sovereignty. Seeking Justice: All the Way to the Supreme Court For the last decade, the Apache Stronghold has been challenging the Federal government in a series of lawsuits to repel Resolution Copper from their sacred land. They argue that the 2014 legislation that gave away their land act violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993, which prohibits any agency, department, or official of the United States or any State from substantially burdening a person's exercise of religion. They also charge that it is in violation of an 1852 treaty promising that the United States would protect Apache land and “secure the permanent prosperity and happiness” of the Apaches. When the trial court declined to stop the land transfer, the Apache Stronghold appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On June 24th, 2022, the Ninth Circuit rejected their case, stating that the land transfer to Resolution Copper did not “ substantially burden the Apaches’ religious exercise . ” The case was reheard by the Ninth Circuit Court in November 2022, but once again was refused on March 1st, 2024. The Apache Stronghold decided to bring their fight to the Supreme Court.    A Prayer Journey from Oak Flats to SCOTUS Stops in Durham Since July 11th, the Apache Stronghold has been traveling across the country from Oak Flat to Washington, D.C. on a prayer journey to raise awareness and build support for their righteous struggle for spiritual sovereignty. They stopped in Durham, North Carolina on September 4th, where UFE hosted them at the Avila Center for Community Leadership. Our staff had the privilege of participating in their prayer ceremony. One week later, their Supreme Court case, Apache Stronghold v. United States , was heard on September 11th, 2024. It is expected that the Court will decide by early next year whether to hear the case. Apache Stronghold organizer, Vannessa Nosie (left), UFE Executive Director, Jeannette Huezo (middle), and Professor and Apache Stronghold organizer, Dr. Wendsler Nosie, Sr. (right). Photo credit: Apache Stronghold A Court Case That Can Change the Nation A decision in Apache Stronghold v. United States will have massive legal implications across the country. It could change longstanding U.S. law, which has recognized that only native people have a “spiritual connection to the land,” and could also substantially impact existing law on religious freedom of all individuals, native and non-native.  With an extremely conservative Supreme Court, this could be a tough battle for the Apache Stronghold. However, in the words of Dr. Wendsler Nosie, Sr., “this fight is only the beginning.” Apache Stronghold v. United States is opening up a much-needed conversation about indigenous sovereignty and modern day colonization. UFE stands in firm solidarity with the Apache Stronghold and will continue to give our support to their struggle. Click the links below to learn more and stand in support. Watch: Apache Stronghold - The Fight to Save Oak Flat    Please donate to the campaign Please share the campaign and click “track this case” to sign up for updates: Apache Stronghold v. United States This article was first published by UFE .

Durham County’s inspection reports of construction projects in the Lick Creek watershed show an alarming indifference to sediment pollution, according to Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop. “In the public records we requested from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, there is a lack of notices of violation for sites that we know are polluting,” Samantha said. “There are 32 active construction sites in this small, 22.9-square-mile watershed, and dozens of them are regularly out of compliance with sediment and erosion control standards.” Samantha has been tracking sediment pollution in the Lick Creek watershed in southeast Durham for more than two years. The extreme turbidity — the amount of soil particles suspended in the water — has been attributed to stormwater runoff from hundreds of acres of surrounding land cleared to make way for new housing developments. “In the first six months of the year, out of the 32 active construction projects in the Lick Creek watershed, only three of those sites received notices of violations despite the fact that dozens were out of compliance,” Samantha said. “In their inspection reports, we can see all of these places where it was noted they were out of compliance — in some cases, the developer was out of compliance for three, four or more inspections in a row — and no notice of violation was issued.” A notice of violation can bring with it a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for non-compliance with sediment and erosion control standards. According to the public records Samantha received from NCDEQ, none of the three civil penalties issued to developers in the Lick Creek watershed earlier this year was more than $1,000. “I think our regulators are too easy on these developers and contractors,” Samantha said. “For these developers with multi-million-dollar budgets, $1,000 means nothing to them.” The cost to the environment, however, is much steeper, she said. “We’ve got these significant environmental costs that we’ve been documenting for over two years, and we’re not asking developers to pay their fair share, even when they’re known polluters,” Samantha said. “The cumulative impacts cannot be overstated.” On Wednesday, Samantha made a trip out to Lick Creek — a tributary of the drinking water source for millions of Raleigh residents, Falls Lake — to do more sampling. “It rained an inch and a half on Saturday, so it was four days after a rain, and you could see where dirty water is just flowing off their sites, from their sediment basins into the creeks,” she said. “The problem is persisting and maybe even getting worse.” Like the work your Riverkeepers are doing? So do we! Donate today to support their efforts in the lab and in the field! This article was first published by Sound Rivers .

Despite calling pro-Duke Energy regulators’ interpretation of the law ‘absurd’, appeals judges give Utilities Commission OK to accept Duke’s biased cost calculations On September 17th, a state appeals court panel rejected claims that regulators violated state law when allowing Duke Energy to downgrade the economic benefits for owners of rooftop solar. The ruling is a step forward for Duke Energy’s 12-year battle against its sole competition: solar power owned by residential, commercial and nonprofit customers. The court said that the clean energy groups challenging the regulators’ decision were correct in insisting that the North Carolina Utilities Commission, or NCUC, was required to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of solar net metering. The ruling said the NCUC’s claim that it didn’t have to do so was “plainly absurd and in direct conflict” with state law [ 1, pg. 20 ]. But the court said that by simply opening a docket on Duke’s proposed rule change and receiving formal comments from other parties, while denying multiple requests for an evidentiary hearing, the NCUC had in fact conducted a sufficient cost analysis. Opponents dispute Duke’s key argument for the October 2023 rules change, in which the NCUC said that non-solar customers are harmed when solar owners are compensated for power they feed onto the grid in a process called net metering. The challenge was led by NC WARN and the Environmental Working Group. But the appeals court judges – Hunter Murphy, John Arrowood, and Tobias Hampson  –  backed the rule, which has already thrown the state solar industry into disorder. The clean energy appellants are considering an appeal to the state Supreme Court because the law requiring an independent cost-benefit analysis is so clear-cut, as even the legislation’s lead author has insisted. “The appeals court seemed to go out of its way to give Duke the win,” said Jim Warren, executive director of NC WARN. “Even the rubber stamp regulators admitted they didn’t do a cost-benefit analysis, but that Duke’s internal numbers were OK. Bizarrely, the court ruled that the regulators’ limited proceeding did count as the analysis.” “The court made a significant blunder by ignoring state law that clearly requires regulators conduct an independent cost-benefit analysis, instead of relying solely on Duke’s own calculations,” said Caroline Leary, EWG’s general counsel and COO. “This setback not only impedes the progress of North Carolina’s expanding solar industry but also deepens the challenges facing the state as it battles the real-time implications of the climate crisis.”   Warren added, “This ruling directly harms our once-growing solar power industry and the communities constantly battered by climate change driven by polluters like Duke Energy. We need the judicial system to uphold the law while other state officials – particularly the rubber-stamping regulators – constantly bend the rules and fair process in deference to this giant corporate polluter,” he said. BACKGROUND During the legal proceedings in February 2024, attorneys for the clean energy coalition hammered Duke Energy and the NCUC for bypassing mandatory independent cost-benefit analysis, required by state law, before reducing incentives for rooftop solar. They argued that rooftop solar offers a swift, cost-effective, and equitable means to transition away from fossil fuels. Additionally, they emphasized compelling evidence, including an analysis from state Attorney General Josh Stein showing how net metering benefits all customers by reducing the need for new gas-fired plants, which contributes to rising rates and climate change. Duke vigorously blocked the independent cost-benefit analysis that would show the truth. The NCUC sided with Duke’s internal calculations without even conducting its own cost-benefit analysis required under state law, or a public hearing as called for by multiple parties including the attorney general. The coalition challenging the NCUC order includes EWG, NC WARN, Sunrise Durham, 350 Triangle, 350 Charlotte, N.C. Climate Solutions Coalition, N.C. Alliance to Protect Our People and the Places We Live, along with retired chemical engineer Donald Oulman. Following a February 2024 court hearing, a senior official from a leading solar company cited a widespread drop in residential and commercial solar sales since the Duke-NCUC net metering rules change took effect in October. More data on statewide sales will become available soon. This article was first published by NC WARN . Work Cited “NC Utilities Commission, et. al. v. Environmental Working Group, et. al.” Republished by NC WARN , 17 Sept. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/NEMAppealDecision9-17-24.pdf . “North Carolina.” SEIA , www.seia.org/state-solar-policy/north-carolina-solar . "IRP Load Growth Fact Sheet". Duke Energy , Jan. 2024 , www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/our-company/carolinas-resource-plan/january-24-fact-sheet.pdf?rev=8e61a3e3e8c844daaf4f2d5b6635c687 .

The longest-ever strike of North Carolina telecommunications workers ended on September 15 with victory for the Communications Workers of America (CWA). After a 30-day strike, AT&T agreed to a tentative agreement (TA) with 19 percent raises as well as improvements to work-life balance and the two-tier system. CWA District 3, which represents 17,000 workers in nine Southeastern states, will vote on the TA in the coming weeks [ 1 ].   Grant Welch is the CWA’s North Carolina legislative and political director. He was hired in 1999 as a technician for Bellsouth, which was absorbed by AT&T in 2006. Though Welch has worked for two companies over a 25-year career, he’s only belonged to one union.   “CWA is membership-led,” said Welch, “Leading up to negotiations we take a vote, and we ask the members, ‘If it comes to it, are you willing to go on strike?’ The vote this time around was 96 or 97 percent yes.” AT&T workers across the Southeast began an unfair labor practices (ULP) strike on August 16. According to the union, the corporation refused to bargain over mandatory subjects in contract negotiations and would not send negotiators with decision-making authority. A ULP strike has benefits and drawbacks from the CWA’s perspective.   “When we’re on an ULP strike, that protects our jobs,” said Welch, “The company can bring in temporary contractors, but they can’t make them permanent.” The main drawback was that workers couldn’t receive strike pay for 15 days due to the ULP designation. CWA was able to tap into its relief fund on August 30. “Even then, that’s only $300 per week for each worker,” said Welch, “At day 29, it increases to $400 a week. We actually stood out long enough to get that increase, but the next day we won. We had a TA.” CWA Local 3611 represents ten AT&T offices across the Triangle. During the strike, picket lines went up at these locations from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Picket lines are instantly respected in communities with an organized working class but aren't a familiar concept to most Southerners. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics,  only 2.7 percent of North Carolina workers belonged to a trade union 2023. “Across District 3, only five percent of our workers crossed that picket line. Ninety-five percent of us held the line. In the South, in nine ‘right-to-work’ states, that is phenomenal.” Workers who side with corporations during strikes are often called “scabs” by their colleagues, who criticize them for benefitting from union contracts but not helping to win them. When the CWA cleared its members to return to work after September 15, it cautioned them not to retaliate against workers who sided with management. “We need to leave those scabs on an island alone by themselves,” said Welch, “There should be zero discussion with them. They took bread off your table while you were fighting  to win a better lifestyle for everyone.” Important strides toward a better lifestyle are laid out in the five-year contract offered by AT&T. The language of the agreement, rather dry to an outsider, will be examined closely by workers as they decide whether to vote for ratification. A few of the TA's gains are outlined below: AT&T hired contractors as temporary workers during the strike. Most employees at the company make between $25 to $35 an hour. The strikebreakers were offered an hourly rate of $200.   “Many of them were brought in under false pretenses,” said Welch, “Some of the contractors didn’t know it was strike work and left when they found out. They said, ‘Man, I'm not crossing the picket line. I was told it was storm relief’. Of course, there were some that just didn't care, who just wanted the money.” AT&T also used managers, some of whom hadn’t done fieldwork in years, to compensate for its striking workforce. The corporation’s use of brand-new contractors and undertrained managers had predictable results. “They messed up so many jobs,” said Welch, “Since the strike ended, we’re going back and fixing so many of their mistakes. But that's the thing, they just wanted the money. They didn't care about the quality of work.” While AT&T floundered, its workforce was rediscovering a spirit of unity on the picket line. Since the 2000s, the company has split up the rank-and-file by creating “lower tier” roles such as Wire Technicians. The two-tier system had led to workers with similar jobs getting very different pay and conditions, a situation designed to sow division. CWA hoped to abolish tiers in the new contract but only achieved a partial victory. The TA consolidates three different wage scales for Wire Technicians into one [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. “Nobody wants to strike, but one of the silver linings is the camaraderie,” said Welch, “When you're on that picket line and when everyone is out of work, there is no job title. There is no disparity in wages, benefits, and job treatment. Everyone is the same and we are all fighting for equality, equity, and respect in the workplace.” The union’s call for equity and respect did not interest many North Carolina politicians. According to the CWA, only twenty-one state officeholders visited the picket line or made a public statement of support. This figure included only one Republican, a performance that speaks for itself. Democratic support for the CWA, though superior to what the GOP offered, was not impressive. Only twenty liberal officeholders backed the workers. Eleven were state representatives, amounting to 23 percent of the NC House Democratic Caucus. Ten percent of the party’s state senators backed the union. Weak support by Democrats was especially revealing since the strike happened in a swing state during a presidential campaign. According to polling averages, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are tied in North Carolina. The state is home to thousands of CWA members, who in turn have tens of thousands of friends and family. A visit to the picket line could have electrified this significant bloc of voters. Harris, Walz, Trump, and Vance all visited North Carolina between August 16 and September 15. None of them stopped by a picket line. The NC AFL-CIO held its annual convention a few days after the AT&T workers won their strike. Governor Roy Cooper spoke before the union federation, which CWA belongs to. Cooper warmly congratulated the union on its 30-day strike, which he hadn’t supported when it was ongoing. Josh Stein, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate, offered half-hearted support for the CWA. During the strike, he agreed to meet with a few workers in a closed-door, no-press meeting. Stein asked what the union wanted in a new contract, enquired about the issues on the job, and agreed to a group photo in front of a CWA Local 3611 banner. Workers at the meeting said they offered Stein a picket sign to hold in the photo. He declined. The CWA offered warm thanks to the three Congresspeople, all Democrats, who publicly sided with the union. Welch said, “We will say Wiley Nickel, Deborah Ross, and Don Davis took action in support of workers. Those are the three who I will say are true champions of labor.” Work Cited “AT&T Southeast Strike Ends.” Communications Workers of America , 15 Sept. 2024, cwa-union.org/news/releases/att-southeast-strike-ends . DiMaggio, Dan. “AT&T Southeast Workers End Month-Long Strike.” Labor Notes , 30 Sept. 2024, www.labornotes.org/blogs/2024/09/att-southeast-workers-end-month-long-strike . DiMaggio, Dan. “AT&T Southeast Strike Nears One Month, With California and Nevada On.” Labor Notes , 19 Sept. 2024, www.labornotes.org/2024/09/att-southeast-strike-nears-one-month-california-and-nevada-brink-walkout .

Image credit: Appily On Wednesday, April 10th, activists met in a Durham church to learn about campaigns for payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) aimed at wealthy, tax-exempt universities. The event was organized by City Council member Nate Baker. The main feature was a conversation with Professor Davarian Baldwin, author of In the Shadow of the Ivory Tower: How Universities Are Plundering Our Cities , a 2021 book about the political economy of higher education.   Major universities like Yale, UPenn, and others have been pressured by grassroots campaigns into making PILOTs to their local communities. Yale pays $23 million per year and UPenn pays $10 million [ 1 , 2 ]. Taking note of these victories, activists in Durham are building a campaign that will push Duke University to contribute $20 million per year to city funds.   The total value of Duke University's properties is unclear, so much so that the most reliable estimate comes from a 1998 article in the Duke Chronicle . The author, formerly a high official of the university, estimated that Duke University's properties were worth " somewhat over $900 million, theoretically obligating Duke to pay some $15 million in taxes across the county and the city. Of that, some $6 million would be payable to the city." [ 3 ] Davarian Baldwin is the Raether Professor at Trinity College and founder of the Smart Cities Lab. Image credit: X account of Davarian Baldwin   The $900 million is worth $1.7 billion when inflation is taken into account. However, the $1.7 billion estimate is certainly too low. It does not include properties that Duke University has acquired since 1998, Durham's increased land values, and several other factors. What is not in dispute is that Duke University and Duke Health System paid only $3.7 million in property taxes in 2023 [ 4 ]. Most of the school's properties are used for educational purposes, making them tax exempt under 501(c)(3) rules. “Duke is an important partner in Durham that has some existing community programs and of course covers some of its own services. Nevertheless, we are essentially subsidizing Duke because they are not paying property taxes,” said Baker. “The cash-strapped city of Durham is, in other words, subsidizing a $12 billion-endowed university.”  [ 5 ]   According to US News & World Report , Duke University is the seventh best university in the US. The achievement is bittersweet since Durham Public Schools is ranked 55th among school districts in North Carolina   [ 6 ].   For an elite university located in a community with poor educational outcomes, voluntary payment of property taxes offers a pathway out of injustice. Duke University may find itself looking at the example of UPenn, which sends $10 million a year to Philadelphia City Schools as their PILOT [ 2 ]. Image credit: Amazon   During the talk, Baldwin observed that universities don’t often volunteer a PILOT. Payments to the community tend to be won by grassroots campaigns, such as when a movement called New Haven Rising brought Yale to the negotiating table.   “Everywhere I go, the schools say, ‘He hates universities’”, said Baldwin, “But every year they put out mission statements talking about being a good neighbor to the community. I’m just holding them to that.”   At Wednesday’s event, some audience members were skeptical that Duke University could be pressured to pay up. Baldwin pushed back. He said that universities get uncomfortable when their business, labor, and political practices are subjected to scrutiny. Since PILOT campaigns tend to involve a great deal of public education on these topics, schools often agree to make voluntary payments to shore up their status as a pillar of the community. City Council member Nate Baker. Image credit: Nate Baker Instagram   “Go talk to 40 and 50-year residents. They have the receipts," said Baldwin, "They want to talk about their stories’”.   Baldwin advised that the PILOT campaign should be led by long-time Durham residents and university workers, particularly the Black members in those groups. He also pointed out that the campaigns often gain allies on the City Council, who are attracted by the prospect of additional revenue.   “What mayor doesn’t want more money?” asked Baldwin.   Work Cited   1.       Basler, Cassandra. “Yale Announces ‘Historic’ $135 Million Payment to New Haven.”  Connecticut Public , 9 Mar. 2023,  www.ctpublic.org/education-news/2021-11-17/yale-announces-historic-135-million-payment-to-new-haven . 2.       Stellino, Molly, and Molly Stellino. “Activists Question Whether Wealthy Universities Should Be Exempt From Property Taxes.”  The Hechinger Report , 18 Dec. 2020,  hechingerreport.org/activists-question-whether-wealthy-universities-should-be-exempt-from-property-taxes . 3.       Burness, John. “Dismiss Durham'S Idea to Tax Duke'S Dime.” The Chronicle , 15 Apr. 1998, www.dukechronicle.com/article/dismiss-durhams-idea-tax-dukes-dime . 4.       Mungai, Mary.  Durham City Councilman Proposes Duke Pay “Fair Share” in Property Taxes | the Durham VOICE . 14 Mar. 2024,  durhamvoice.org/durham-city-councilman-proposes-duke-pay-fair-share-in-property-taxes/#:~:text=According%20to%20their%202023%20Annual,million%20in%20property%20taxes%20annually . 5.       Duke University.  Duke University’s Endowment . 2023,  giving.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/DukeEndowment.pdf . 6.       “Durham Public Schools - North Carolina.”  Niche ,  www.niche.com/k12/d/durham-public-schools-nc .

On July 28th, activists set up a table at CCB Plaza to canvass Durham residents about fair taxation of Duke University. Sunday's event was organized by Duke Respect Durham, a coalition of twenty community groups that are pressuring the university to make voluntary payments in lieu of taxes (PILOT). Duke University owns about 12 percent of land in the city of Durham [ 1 ] [ 2 ]. As an educational institution, the university is exempt from what would be tens of millions of dollars in property tax on its non-commercial holdings. Duke University and Duke Health System paid only $3.7 million in property taxes in 2023 [ 3 ].  According to Duke Respect Durham, the table at CCB Plaza saw plenty of foot traffic because of an open-air market on Foster Street. Handing out fliers and striking up conversations, the canvassers asked Durham residents, “What can Durham do with $50 million?” The most common replies were that a PILOT from Duke University should be used to fund Durham Public Schools, Durham Housing Authority, and GoDurham. The PILOT movement in Durham has been inspired by successful movements at Yale University, the University of Pennsylvania, and other elite schools. In 2021, a campaign called Yale Respect New Haven pressured the university to increase its annual PILOT to $23 million [ 4 ]. In 2020, the University of Pennsylvania agreed to make a $10 million PILOT to Philadelphia Public Schools in response to criticism that the university wasn’t doing enough to promote education in its own backyard. The concession came after years of pressure from “ Philadelphia Jobs With Justice , a pro-labor nonprofit … [and] Penn for PILOTs, the first campaign led by staff and faculty members” [ 5 ].  At the July 28th event, one Durham resident said, “I know a lot of Duke professors. They choose to live in Chapel Hill because they want to send their kids to decent public schools”. The resident signed the Duke Respect Durham petition, along with dozens of other people who stopped by the campaign’s table [ 6 ]. According to Niche , an education website, Durham Public Schools is ranked 55th out of 115 school districts in North Carolina [ 7 ].  The total value of Duke University property is unclear. The most recent, reliable figure comes from a 1998 Duke Chronicle  article in which a university public relations official estimated " somewhat over $900 million, theoretically obligating Duke to pay some $15 million in taxes across the county and the city" [ 8 ]. Adjusted for inflation, that property would now be worth $1.7 billion.  However, property values in Durham have risen faster than inflation in recent decades. The House Price Index for Durham-Chapel Hill has more than tripled since 1998 [ 9 ]. If the index’s increase is applied, Duke University property would be worth around $2.9 billion, not accounting for property bought or sold since 1998. If that rough estimate is accurate, Duke University is exempt from about $40 million in property taxes each year [ 10 ]. The canvassers said that not everyone they talked to agreed with the PILOT campaign. A group of young men scoffed at the idea of Duke University paying property taxes and said the reason is because “That’s our alma mater!” According to Duke Respect Durham, the PILOT campaign is working to show people connected to Duke University that there’s no contradiction between having fond college memories and demanding that the wealthy institution help to fund basic public services like education, housing, and transit. With a $12 billion endowment, Duke University can certainly afford to pay its fair share. Work Cited “Duke Facts.” Facts , 23 July 2024, https://facts.duke.edu . “Durham: By the Numbers”. City of Durham , 2020, www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/34785/Durham-By-the-Numbers-English-FY20 . Mungai, Mary. “Durham City Councilman Proposes Duke Pay “Fair Share” in Property Taxes”  The Durham VOICE . 14 Mar. 2024, https://durhamvoice.org/durham-city-councilman-proposes-duke-pay-fair-share-in-property-taxes/ Rayala, Sai. “City and University Officials Announce Six-year Commitment, Increases to Yale’s Voluntary Contribution.” Yale Daily News , 19 Nov. 2021, https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2021/11/17/city-and-university-officials-announce-six-year-commitment-increases-yales-voluntary-contribution . Stallion, Molly. “Activists Question Whether Wealthy Universities Should Be Exempt From Property Taxes.” The Hechinger Report , 18 Dec. 2020, https://hechingerreport.org/activists-question-whether-wealthy-universities-should-be-exempt-from-property-taxes . “President Price and CEO Albanese: Let’s Work Toward a Just Durham.” https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/dukerespectdurham . “Durham Public Schools.” Niche , www.niche.com/k12/d/durham-public-schools-nc . Burness, John. “Dismiss Durham’s Idea to Tax Duke’s Dime.” Duke Chronicle , 15 Apr. 1998, www.dukechronicle.com/article/dismiss-durhams-idea-tax-dukes-dime . “All-Transactions House Price Index for Durham-Chapel Hill, NC”. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis , 28 May 2024, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ATNHPIUS20500Q . “Tax Rates.” Durham County , 2024, www.dconc.gov/county-departments/departments-f-z/tax-administration/tax-rates .

Duke Energy’s 2022 promise to investors [ 1, pg. 18 ] that it will pour $75 billion into high-voltage transmission projects in its monopoly states by 2032 was belied recently when its expert witnesses admitted to NC regulators that building new transmission corridors could meet such local opposition “that you can’t move forward with it.” [ 2, pg. 167 ] [ 3, pg. 48 ]. The statements were made under oath during questioning at NC Utilities Commission hearings over Duke’s Carbon Plan. Although in 2022 Duke quietly indicated plans to build hundreds of miles of new transmission in eastern NC, this is the first time any specific plan was hinted at – along with the enormous risk to investors and ratepayers posed by such a gamble. Since 2022, NC WARN and eastern NC community groups have criticized Duke Energy’s secrecy. And we’ve warned its corporate and nonprofit allies that trying to seize land and bulldoze through farms, forests and communities runs the same risks that led to the 2020 defeat of Duke and Dominion Energy’s attempt to build an $8 billion fracked gas pipeline through the same region. At the hearings, two Duke witnesses finally shed a little light on its plans, indicating it might attempt to build a large high-voltage line from Wake County to New Bern, but no final decision has been made. Typically, before alerting the public about unwanted projects, Duke Energy quietly seeks to purchase land and to gain approval from local officials and other community leaders. That well-worn pattern led to ongoing outrage by residents of Green Pond, SC, where Duke is attempting to build a 4.5-mile transmission corridor [ 4 ]. The Duke witnesses indicated the risk for new transmission projects is high even when Duke already owns much of the right-of-way, thus lowering the need to seize land through eminent domain. Duke leaders loosely claim that much of any new and upgraded transmission infrastructure is needed for future renewable power, but NC WARN believes it’s mainly intended for Duke’s plans to build dozens of fracked gas-fired and nuclear power units. NC WARN supports necessary grid upgrades and improvements that don’t harm communities. Although our Sharing Solar proposal supports so-called solar farms, we want them equitably sited and built close to where power is used. Proposal For Sweeping Shift To Local Solar So far, the NC Utilities Commission has unofficially gone along with Duke’s high-rolling grid gamble – just as it has with plans for fracked gas plants and experimental nuclear reactors. According to its own testimony, Duke’s Carbon Plan strategies are very high risk, they’d drive up power bills year after year, and they’re far too slow to meet climate scientists’ demand to phase out fossil fuels this decade. The now-exposed risks and billion-dollar cost of the Wake-to-New Bern scheme amplifies the need for transparency, and for this state to expand – instead of suppress – low-risk, local solar-plus-storage (SPS). NC WARN and allies are proposing a sweeping statewide expansion of no-upfront cost SPS in a way that helps all power users, particularly those most in need. This Sharing Solar proposal is the fastest, cheapest and most equitable way to get North Carolina off fossil fuels [ 5 ]. All power users would share the benefits, and we’d all share the costs through our monthly power bills – just like we now pay for dirty, damaging power. We are convinced that rapidly expanding solar on roofs and parking lots is essential if this state is ever to get onto the right side of the climate crisis. This article was first published by NC WARN . Work Cited "Q3 2022 Earnings Review and Business Update." Duke Energy , 4 Nov. 2022, https://s201.q4cdn.com/583395453/files/doc_financials/2022/q3/Q3-2022-Earnings-Presentation-vFINAL-(with-Reg-G).pdf “2024 Carbon Plan Expert Witness Hearing Transcript, Vol. 11.” NC Utilities Commission , 26 July 2024, https://starw1.ncuc.gov/NCUC/ViewFile.aspx?Id=20de7107-1f8d-497f-8473-41b621328494 “2024 Carbon Plan Expert Witness Hearing Transcript, Vol. 12.” NC Utilities Commission , 29 July 2024, https://starw1.ncuc.gov/NCUC/ViewFile.aspx?Id=6e8e7c24-f201-49a7-996b-a7b7cf1e6a17 Runkel, Grace. “Neighbors Call for New Law as Duke Energy Looks to Build Transmission Lines Through Community.”  Fox Carolina , 19 July 2024,  www.foxcarolina.com/2024/07/19/neighbors-call-new-law-duke-energy-looks-build-transmission-lines-through-community “Sharing Solar Summary.” NC WARN , https://www.ncwarn.org/sharing-solar-summ/