Search Results
62 items found for ""
- Scores of Businesses, Nonprofits Come Out Against Duke Energy’s Carbon Plan
Amid a ghastly global escalation of crippling heat waves, wildfires and superstorms, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said last week that world leaders must quickly find “an exit ramp off the highway to climate hell.” He slammed fossil fuel corporations as the “godfathers of climate chaos.” In North Carolina, one of the largest of those corporate godfathers, Duke Energy, proposes to greatly expand fossil fuel use while strangling the fastest, cheapest and fairest path to slow the crisis: rooftop solar-plus-storage (SPS), also known as local solar and distributed generation. In voluminous filings to the NC Utilities Commission on May 28th, attorneys representing scores of social justice, environmental, consumer, and business groups, along with Attorney General Josh Stein, widely rejected Duke Energy’s Carbon Plan proposal for handling the state’s electricity needs in coming decades. Nearly all parties oppose Duke Energy’s plans to gamble on high-risk, super-costly experimental technologies and to greatly expand the use of methane gas for power generation. Most parties cite the need for a shift to renewable power, with Stein’s lawyers alluding to more solar-plus-storage on homes and businesses. As initial filings are digested, it seems that many groups will explicitly support NC WARN’s proposal for a sweeping expansion of SPS by having it funded through the rate system. Joining NC WARN in presenting that proposal to the NCUC are the Charlotte-Mecklenburg NAACP, Robeson County’s Seeds of HOPE and the Down East Coal Ash Environmental and Social Justice Coalition. At least six other interveners’ refer to the need for more distributed generation including the office of Attorney General Josh Stein, The City of Charlotte, Walmart, the Environmental Working Group, the NCUC’s public staff and more. Sharing Solar Proposal Helps All Customers: Local solar-plus-storage (SPS) could expand across NC quickly, inexpensively and equitably – with priority given to disadvantaged communities and emergency facilities. There’s no cost for customers to add SPS; it would be funded through the rate system – just as we now all pay for dirty power. All homes, businesses and nonprofits benefit – even if they don’t have solar. Solar companies grow, creating thousands of jobs in small towns and cities. Sharing Solar would improve resiliency and provide backup power during outages. It avoids the constant rate hikes and high risks saddling Duke Energy’s plans. In written testimony supporting Sharing Solar, engineer Rao Konidena describes how Duke Energy rigged its modeling to virtually exclude consideration of SPS. He also told the NCUC that, in proposing large generation projects situated far from where power is most used, Duke Energy is “creating a dependency on transmission to deliver that far away generation …”. As the Environmental Working Group told the NCUC, Duke Energy favors large scale power infrastructure over cheaper and more reliable smaller scale alternatives, such as SPS, which can act as “virtual power plants” that allow the utility to draw from customers’ batteries during periods of high, system-wide demand. Among the interveners, there was little support for Duke Energy’s high-risk and secretive plans to risk tens of billions building questionable transmission corridors that might lead to giant solar farms many years from now.* NC WARN and other community groups have predicted that controversy would spring from any attempt by Duke Energy to intrude upon farms, forests and communities in eastern North Carolina while blocking local SPS. The NCUC will conduct a judicial-style hearing beginning on July 22nd in Raleigh. It is clear that the only way North Carolina can finally get aligned with the climate scientists is to rapidly expand local solar-plus-storage. All professed leaders must stop pretending that the Duke Energy Carbon Plan is moving the state toward decarbonization. *A group of co-intervenors filed one expert testimony strongly supporting Duke Energy’s grid buildout. Inexplicably, a second expert witness praised how distributed generation such as SPS could be expanded quickly and inexpensively. This article was published first by NC WARN.
- State DHHS and UNC Workers Hold Political Action Day at North Carolina State Legislature
UE Local 150 members from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the University of North Carolina (UNC) held a political action day at the state legislature on Thursday, May 16th to urge their representatives to take action to improve working conditions for public-sector workers around the state. Members gave speeches and chanted outside the capitol on the front lawn to call attention to their unlivable wages and working conditions. “The staff shortages in DHHS are as bad as they have ever been,” said Sekia Royall, President of Local 150 and cook at the O’Berry Center in Goldsboro. “Each facility is looking at at least 30 percent vacancy rate across the state with the nursing staffing agency contracts expiring this summer workers are concerned that the vacancy rate will double. “North Carolina has tried to temporarily fix our staff shortage by hiring temporary workers paying them twice the money that they pay long-term dedicated staff, and we are tired of it. Our demand for a $20 per hour minimum wage is necessary to keep up with the current inflation.” DHHS has been working to address overlapping crises in North Carolina related to mental health and opioid addiction, while also dealing with a shortage of inpatient beds for patients with dementia and developmental disorders. In addition, the state legislature has not addressed the critical staffing shortages at the state’s 13 hospitals. UE Local 150 members said that continued inaction will lead to the loss of more inpatient hospital beds which provide critical services to their most vulnerable residents. The members have urged legislators to act because record vacancy rates are creating more difficult working conditions and stagnant salaries, which are not keeping up with the skyrocketing cost of housing and food. “We know that our state has a $1.4 billion surplus and we want our legislative body to allocate those funds in a way that is consistent with our values,” said Rakesh Patel, a state DHHS worker from Central Regional Hospital. “We are asking for DHHS and the legislative body to appropriate more funds so we can have a 20 percent increase in our salaries or a $20 minimum wage." “We also think there are issues that don’t involve money, which include assigning a safe staffing task force and addressing the chronic toxic workplace culture that we are seeing in our hospitals. State workers come to take care of these patients and we want to see them leave physically intact and emotionally intact.” North Carolina is also set to be the first state to completely eliminate corporate income taxes, draining between $6 and 8 billion from critical public services and jobs. Local 150 members met with over a dozen legislators urging them to raise state workers’ salaries by 20 percent and institute a $20 minimum wage for state workers. They are calling for corporations pay their fair share of taxes, safe staffing, an end to toxic work environments, and a repeal of the ban on public sector collective bargaining in the state. In recent weeks, Local 150 graduate worker members at UNC and NC State University have also been peacefully calling on their university to divest from the Israeli military, which is currently bombarding the people of Palestine. Administrations at the universities responded by violently attacking, arresting, and suspending students and graduate workers. This included UE Local 150’s UNC graduate worker co-chapter president Hashem Amireh, who is Palestinian, while peacefully protesting. The union is calling for the charges to be dropped and suspensions to be overturned. UNC union members are also calling for an end to parking and graduate worker fees which are paid by campus workers. Videos from the rally and press conference can be seen on the UE Local 150 YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/@ue150ncpublicserviceworker5. This article was published first by UE Local 150.
- Union Members and Labor Organizers Converge on Charlotte for Southern Worker School
Southern politicians have gone out of their way in word and action to make clear they stand on the side of big business and racism as they’ve recently lamented that the “Alabama [ie – Southern] model for success is under attack” and vowing to “fight unions to the gates of hell.” Nearly two hundred rank and filers who are developing a movement of workers in the South that can build power to make these politicians’ fears a reality gathered in Charlotte, NC on May 17 – 19 for the 2024 Southern Worker School. These meetings are the annual organizing conference of the Southern Workers Assembly network, which includes local workers assemblies, worker organizations, and other workers from various sectors and states throughout the region. As the upsurge in worker organizing and fightback continues to expand – most notably represented in the UAW drives across the auto industry – the 2024 elections loom and the broader social movement to end the U.S. supported Israeli genocide in Palestine widens and spread, the gathering came at particularly timely juncture to assess conditions and develop united plans for advancing in this period. “Being in a room with such a diverse group of workers, we can consider that a real cross section of the American landscape. It felt like a new beginning of the labor movement to me, a room filled with people organizing to achieve justice in the workplace, from all walks of life, to make sure we have justice for everyone regardless of race, gender, etc,” remarked Jamie Muhammad, Vice President of the International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1414 in Savannah, Georgia. “It was powerful, too, to see so many people wearing keffiyehs and showing solidarity with Palestine. Those are the type of people who look at the news and are aware of everyone’s suffering and want equality for everyone. I’ve never been in a room like that before. When the working people in the South rise up and we come together on a common cause, we can lead the rest of the nation where it needs to go.” This was the largest worker school convened by the Southern Workers Assembly to date, and included delegations and participation from: El Futuro Es Nuestro/It’s Our Future; Siembra NC; United Campus Workers; UAW; ILA Local 1422; ILA Local 1414; Truckers Movement for Justice (TMJ); UE Local 150; UE Local 111; Union of Southern Service Workers (USSW); National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA); Carolina Amazonians United for Solidarity & Empowerment (CAUSE); Duke Graduate Students Union (DGSU); National Nurses United; and several locals of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), among others. Building a movement & worker networks The opening session of the school kicked off only hours after the result of the vote by Mercedes workers in Alabama on whether to join the UAW was concluded. This opening panel discussion sought to offer some assessment of the organizing across the South, while raising some specific examples and practices from worker network building outside the context of a solely NLRB election approach. The panel included Ashaki Binta from Black Workers for Justice (BWFJ); Corey Hill, president of UAW Local 3520 and chair of the Daimler Truck North America Council; Dominic Harris, president of the Charlotte Chapter of UE Local 150; Miranda Escalante, Asheville Food and Beverage Workers United (AFBU); and TaShira Smith, a founding member of the Union of Southern Service Workers (USSW). Ed Bruno, a member of the SWA Coordinating Committee, offered these remarks at the discussion’s opening, saying: “The SWA congratulates the UAW for the election at Volkswagen and Mercedes. The vote counting doesn’t matter. What matters is the workers’ and the UAW’s motivation, willingness, and resources to organize the Southern auto industry.” Bruno continued, noting, “The Southern auto industry will not be organized one election at a time, nor will the hospital industry or logistics or any industry. We encourage other unions to follow their example. The UAW founding in the 1930s was based on sit-down strikes that were multi-corporation, multi-location efforts to organize the entire auto industry. That’s the way the modern labor movement was formed. And that’s the way the South will be organized today.” Ashaki Binta expanded on these points, drawing on the 40 year history of Black Workers for Justice organizing workers in North Carolina, noting, “Through our experience, we learned that traditional methods of trade union organizing would not work in the South. Understanding the political and economic structure of the South, that was built to maintain the region as a cheap labor market for capital, and the oppression of Black people in particular as the basis for that market, impacting all other workers. Sixty percent of Black workers live in the U.S. South. The question of building power for working people has to be the objective and basis of our work. The experience of the UAW is extremely important and we are looking forward to learning all that we can from their work. Even so, there are still millions of workers in the South that need to be organized.” USSW, AFBU, and UE150 worker leaders all contributed lessons of how they’ve developed worker networks that prioritize collective action and movement building, utilizing this central orientation to win on issues and grow their organizations. Joining this discussion just over a week after the record contract won by Daimler Truck North America workers was overwhelmingly ratified, Local 3520 President Hill reminded everyone that, “We won a record contract. But the war has just begun. The thing of it is, they always change the game plan on us to keep us divided. Divided no more we will be. When we stand together that’s where our strength comes from. We took six locals and brought them together. Not the bargaining committee, not the leadership, but the workers won that contract. They proved they could set out and walk that line and do what they needed to do. But we have a lot of work to do.” Higher levels of consciousness, coordinated collective actions The remainder of the weekend focused on deepening sector-based networks, sharing out organizing reports on lessons from workers assemblies and workplace committees, political education, and assessing interventions made by workers across the SWA network in solidarity with Palestine – from organizing contingents in demonstrations, education workers and others building solidarity with student encampments, moving ceasefire resolutions through union locals and city councils, and more. “It was powerful to see how so many other workers are thinking like me and fighting to make change in the workplace,” said Shenika Brown, a truck driver from Memphis, TN, and a member of Truckers Movement for Justice. During the political education discussion, led by Abdul Alkalimat of the SWA Education Committee, attention was given to analyzing and assessing the political economy of the South. Alkalimat broke down the concepts of the base – the productive forces – and superstructure – the consumption of commodities/services, social reproduction, ideas, etc – of the economy. In particular, there are many changes occurring in the base of the Southern economy in this period, with large capital investments in manufacturing and electric vehicle production, that are worth the attention of worker cadre to understand and incorporate into our strategic thinking. In light of these developments, the Southern Workers Assembly has recently launched a program aimed at recruiting workers to get jobs in some of these growing, strategic sectors of the Southern economy. This program was discussed in some detail during the weekend. There was also a great deal of discussion of political power and how it’s developed, in light of the 2024 elections. The Southern Workers Assembly’s nine point Worker Power Program was raised as a way for workers to make independent political interventions that are connected to the primary objective of building organization and power in the workplace. Workers from the logistics, manufacturing, public, building trades, healthcare, education, and service sectors held breakout discussions on Saturday afternoon, during which time they were able to share about the work and fights they’d been engaged in and identify more opportunities for coordination going forward. “At each of the past two SWA worker schools, there’ve been industry breakouts where I’ve met multiple union brothers and sisters from my sector. And these are members who’re already committed, long-term, in seeing a real united working class force in the South. An organization that can pull in building trades workers like that is, frankly, rare. I come away from these weekends with people who live states away but who I can consistently rely on for educated strategies and resources. The value of that is immeasurable,” said Chris Anders, a rank & file member of IBEW LU 666 in Richmond, VA. At the November 2023 worker school, service and education workers formed industry councils that have met on a semi-regular basis since that time, and made plans to continue to coordinate coming out of the most recent school. In addition, public sector workers from Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina formed a pubic sector council that intends to meet going forward. “To see teachers and rank and filers from Amazon and other places, even though we work in different industries to see and hear that we have a common thread to be treated with dignity and respect was powerful. We’re all fighting to make our employers recognize our value and to assert that we do have a voice. To see all of us coming together was amazing, united around a basic thread that we want to be treated with dignity and respect and should be paid what we are worth. We’re human beings, not robots,” Mary Hill, vice president and co-founder of CAUSE, reflected. “I was especially encouraged to build solidarity with migrant workers and to see so many young people at the worker school. The group we brought from CAUSE was largely new members. We’re not just fighting our own struggle at different workplaces, we’re building a movement and it’s a legacy we are passing on to the younger generations coming behind us. It gives me hope for the future to see younger generations getting involved in struggles at their workplaces.” The worker school contributed towards advancing the deepening of worker networks across the region, and in addition to providing space for exchanges and coordination among the ten active workers assemblies, workers from more than half a dozen other cities were in attendance and are making plans to begin building assemblies in their cities coming out of the gathering. The movement to organize the South marches forward. This article was published first by Southern Workers Assembly
- Rally in Charlotte Demands Accountability From Bankers Who Financed Mountain Valley Pipeline
On Wednesday, May 8, 2024, a crowd of 100 frontline community members impacted by the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) and allies gathered in Charlotte to hold the financiers behind MVP accountable for the destruction the pipeline has wrought across Appalachia. This action took place a week after MVP experienced serious pipe failures during hydrostatic testing as it tries to go into service at the end of May. “We face life-threatening conditions on this methane gas pipeline route due to MVP’s recklessness and it’s all made possible by these banks and asset managers. We are in the midst of a climate crisis; these financiers must stop locking their investors into bad deals by backing companies like MVP,” said directly harmed community member and co-director of POWHR Russell Chisholm. Activists, carrying signs that said “Defund MVP”, met in the morning at Vanguard’s offices to call out their continued reckless and immoral financing of methane gas pipelines like MVP which contribute to climate chaos and destruction. Vanguard is the single largest investor of fossil fuels in the world. “Vanguard is often insulated from the ugly impacts of its massive investments in expanding fossil fuel development, but we know that the Mountain Valley Pipeline is a danger to everyday people living nearby, and ultimately, a bad investment for Vanguard. We came all the way from Pennsylvania to act in solidarity with those on the frontlines of this pipeline, and we will be sharing their stories with the growing number of Vanguard customers who are ready to move their money out if Vanguard continues on this dangerous path,” said Lina Blount, Director of Strategy and Partnerships at the Earth Quaker Action Team. The actions continued in uptown Charlotte where 100 Indigenous water protectors, frontline leaders, and allies carrying puppets and signs, and singing songs and chants, delivered letters on the financial risk of MVP to Wells Fargo, Chase, and Bank of America. They conducted a mock-trial in front of the Bank of America headquarters called “The People vs. Bank of America”, to expose the crimes against humanity and the planet. “No human being can survive without clean water, yet Bank of America continues to fund projects like MVP that destroy precious drinking water sources without a second thought. These banks and asset managers must know that MVP continues to wrack up unprecedented violations, including violations of the rights of tribal nations to informed consultation. So long as they choose to keep funding these harms, our multiracial, multi-faith grassroots movement will only keep getting louder,” said Dr. Crystal Cavalier-Keck, co-founder of 7 Directions of Service, Citizen of the Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation, and impacted community member on the Southgate route. This action continues the work that local faith leaders and activists with GreenFaith have been leading against Bank of America including monthly Earth Witness Wednesday events and the most recent protest on April 23 the day before the bank’s annual general meeting. “Our many faiths teach us that we are to care for people and protect the planet. The financial decisions of big banks are destroying the planet and causing untold human suffering. As people of faith and conscience we know this is wrong, inhumane and also deeply unjust since so many of these projects disproportionately exploit Indigenous lands and peoples as well as many black and brown communities in the US and the Global South,” said Rev. Amy Brooks Paradise, US Organizer with GreenFaith. Further interviews are available with frontline leaders, including: Dr. Crystal Cavalier Keck (co-founder of 7 Directions of Service and impacted community member on the Southgate route), Russell Chisholm (co-director of the POWHR Coalition and directly harmed community member on the MVP mainline route), and Mariah Clay (MVP organizer with West Virginia Rivers Coalition). This article was published first by POWHR.
- The Three Year Assault on City Workers in Durham
After COVID struck, the annual raises given to Durham city workers were lower than the inflation rate for three years in a row. The period of real-terms pay cuts, given that wages were already low, devastated municipal employees and city departments. The worst case is the Department of Public Works, where 68 percent of positions are empty. Raises were skipped in FY20–21 and were unusually low in FY21–22. While raises were normal in FY22–23 they were still lower than inflation. In each of these fiscal years, the City Council added millions of dollars to Durham’s rainy day fund, which hit a record-high of $76.5 million in FY22–23. City workers have organized a response. Solid Waste workers, represented by UE Local 150, pulled off a successful strike in September 2023. The City Council will be deciding the FY24–25 budget in June 2024, and a progressive coalition is pushing them to raise city workers’ pay to $25 per hour. Wage Austerity, Vacancy Rates, Fiscal Conditions According to the US Inflation Calculator, inflation has been about 20 percent since 2020 [1]. That has overwhelmed the annual raises of Durham city workers, who are split into three groups — general employees, police, and firefighters. There is a fourth group of “open range” employees but this represents a smaller number of well-paid management and technical positions. The three main groups are in pretty much the same boat — the value of their wages has shrunk. Here is a quote about the situation for general employees in the Department of Public Works: “Over the past four years, wages for public works employees in Durham, who are overwhelmingly African-American, have increased by 15 percent while inflation has risen by 23 percent.” — Payday Report, September 2023 [2] Firefighters have been treated in almost the same way. Their pay has gone up 16 percent in the last four years. That is a four percent cut in real-terms pay, according to the US Inflation Calculator numbers. FY16–17 [3a, pg. 8], FY17–18 [3b, pg. 4], FY18–19 [3c, pg. 5], FY19–20 [3d, pg. 4], FY20–21 [3e, pg. 3], FY21–22 [3f, pg. 3], FY22–23 [3g, pg. 13], FY23–24 [3h, pg. 15] Recently, the City Council had an opportunity to mend fences with at least one group of workers. In June 2023, former Mayor Elaine O’Neal introduced a motion to give firefighters “reclassifications” that were skipped during COVID. The measure would have set aside $8 million to raise their wages. Council members DeDreanna Freeman, Monique Hosley-Hyman, and former mayor Elaine O’Neal voted in favor, but the motion was defeated by a four-member majority — Mark Antony-Middleton, Javiera Caballero, Jillian Johnson, and current mayor Leonardo Williams [4]. “I think they needed to know. Straight up,” Mayor O’Neal after the motion was voted down. “Sometimes, you can just make it simple.” Low pay and low raises have led to high vacancy rates in many city departments. The Department of Public Works has the worst rate of empty roles (68 percent), but Emergency Communications (23 percent), Police (21 percent), Solid Waste (11 percent), and Fire (9 percent) are also plagued by the issue. Public Works, 68 percent as of October 2023 [5] / Emergency Communications Center, 23 percent as of March 2024 [6] / Police, 21 percent as of March 2024 [7] / Solid Waste (collections positions*) [8], 11 percent as of March 2024 / Fire, nine percent as of August 2023 [9] While raises were withheld from city workers, tens of millions of dollars piled into Durham’s rainy day fund. City workers got no annual raise at all in FY20–21, so although inflation was quite low their wages still lost value. In the same year, Durham poured $9.9 million into the “general fund unassigned fund balance,” also known as the rainy day fund. The City Council’s move to freeze wages went against economic orthodoxy, which calls for higher public spending during crises to stimulate the weakened private sector. From a moral point of view, denying a raise to these essential workers was outrageous. In the course of their work, municipal employees exposed themselves and their families to huge risks and got a real-terms pay cut for their trouble. The next year, city workers got two to four percent raises, below the pre-COVID norm. Inflation spiked to seven percent, making FY21–22 the worst year of wage austerity. Meanwhile, the City Council added $11.5 million to the rainy day fund, the largest increase in six years. Whatever the City Council's intentions, their policy created a massive pool of money for whatever programs they wished to establish or fund, and did so on the backs of the city’s workforce. FY22–23 was the last year of real-terms pay cuts. Annual raises for city workers went back to the normal level, but 6.5 percent inflation erased the gains. Millions of dollars continued to flow into the rainy day fund, which reached an all-time peak of $76.5 million. FY16–17 [10a, pg. 156], FY17–18 [10a, pg. 157], FY18–19 [10a, pg. 157], FY19–20 [10a, pg. 157], FY20–21 [10a, pg. 157], FY21–22 [10a, pg. 24], FY22–23 [10b, pg. 5] Not all of it could really be spent. Durham prefers that the rainy day fund not fall below 16.75 percent of general fund spending, although the state only requires 13 percent. At the FY22–23 peak, the fund was $35.6 million above the minimum level. After June 2023, the $35.6 million excess in the rainy day fund started to drop — to $32 million, then $18 million, then $11 million. “The general fund has about $32 million in reserves above the money it needs to have on hand, according to the latest figures ... Nearly $14 million was allocated in the budget approved in July [2023], leaving about $18 million to work with.” — News and Observer, September 2023 [11] In October 2023, the City Council approved $1,000 to 5,000 bonuses in response to a strike by Solid Waste workers, a concession that cost $6.5 million [12]. That money could have been used earlier to give normal raises, probably avoiding the strike’s disruption to workers and the community. FY16–17 [3b, pg. 4], FY17–18 [3b, pg. 4], FY18–19 [3d, pg. 5], FY19–20 [3d, pg. 5], FY20–21 [3f, pg. 4], FY21–22 [3f, pg. 4], FY22–23 [3h, pg. 16], FY23–24 [3h, pg. 16] New Programs Established During Wage Austerity During the three years of wage austerity, the City Council started new programs like HEART, which stands for Holistic, Empathetic, Assistance, Response Teams (HEART). The program, established in July 2022, sends unarmed social workers to emergency calls that don’t require a police officer. The budget for the HEART program is currently $6.4 million, a sum that has grown quickly since the program was established [13]. HEART is a great concept that the City Council was right to create and fund. It is a serious answer to the demands for less militarized public safety that rose up during the Black Lives Matter movement. However, the timing of the program’s creation shows that City Council had money it was willing to spend on recurring annual expenditures that could have been used for city workers’ annual raises. Solid Waste - Solidarity Sparks Action Workers in the Department of Solid Waste Management conducted a "stand down" in September 2023 [5]. “They refused to load the city’s trucks, leaving trash and recycling bins at the curb, prompting the city to send independent contractors on their routes.” — News and Observer [12] Showing remarkable solidarity, the Solid Waste workers made demands on behalf of all city workers and not just themselves — that all city workers should get a $5,000 bonus, pay for work outside of their job title, and all temporary workers should be hired on a permanent basis [14]. The strike was technically illegal due to pro-corporate laws in North Carolina, but the City Council chose not to enforce the legislation. The Solid Waste workers went on to secure a partial victory. In October 2023, the City Council voted unanimously to give all city workers bonuses between $1,000 to 5,000, with larger sums given to those with lower pay [12]. Though a welcome development, the October 2023 bonus did not resolve the root problems of low pay and low raises. The one-time payment will help workers pay some bills, but won't help recruit or retain employees. Unless those insufficient pay and raises are corrected in the FY24–25 budget, Durham will continue to lose skilled and experienced workers, with an effect on institutional memory that is not so easily repaired. Photo credit: UE Local 150 Emergency Comms The Durham Emergency Communications Center (DECC) answers 911 calls. As of February 2024, the department had a 23 percent vacancy rate, which sounds terrible but in fact is a huge improvement [6]. The rate of empty roles was 42 percent in August 2021 [15]. The problems in Emergency Comms, such as high turnover, could likely be solved by paying a living wage. New coverage about Emergency Comms may have been the first time many Durham residents learned that city departments were being hollowed out. On the night of August 18, 2021, six people were shot at McDougald Terrace. Residents that they’d called 911 six times before anyone answered, causing a scandal and forcing the mayor to apologize [16]. Emergency Comms has improved since then, but problems remain. An industry standard is that 911 call centers need to answer 90 percent of calls in ten seconds or less. Durham has not met that standard in any month since at least 2022. For example, in December 2023 the percent of calls answered in the proper time was 79.2 percent. However, DECC improved to 89.9 percent in February 2024, close to an acceptable level [6]. Image credit: Durham Emergency Communications Center [6] Positions at Emergency Comms do not pay well. New hires started with a salary of $39,000 as of January 2023 [17]. According to the MIT Living Wage Calculator, a worker in Durham needs to earn about $58,000 if their family is made up of two working adults and two children [18]. The wide gap between need and reality fuels a 65 percent turnover rate (as of June 2022) — three times the national average for 911 call centers [19]. “99 employees were hired to work at the DECC from fiscal year 2020 to fiscal year 2022, and during that same time frame, 81 employees quit.” — CBS 17, July 2022 [19] Fast turnover has simple causes like insufficient pay and raises. However, the problem manifests in complex ways. A few workers retire early, others change fields, or employees can be poached by cities that offer fair pay. Fire Department Firefighters at the Durham Fire Department are unionized but the local chapter was never considered very active. That has begun to change. “Blue-collar city workers, the majority of whom are Black, have united with firefighters and their union, Fire Fighters (IAFF) Local 668, who have been mobilizing around similar issues.” — Labor Notes, October 2023 [5] Firefighters in Durham are paid much less than their peers in nearby cities. Starting pay is about $41,000, comparing poorly with Raleigh ($47,000) or Apex ($51,000). It’s a wonder that loss of staff to other cities isn’t a worse issue. Only seven firefighters left for other departments in FY22–23 [20]. Photo credit: Durham Fire Department Durham’s firefighters may have been relatively non-militant, but everyone has their breaking point. When the City Council held hearings on the FY23–24 budget in June 2023, firefighters in attendance blasted their low pay in searing terms. “Do you think $14 an hour is enough compensation to show up first to an emergency scene then run across I-85 with a jump bag to start CPR on a 6-month-old infant who had been ejected over the overpass?” — Firefighter quoted by WRAL News [21] In August 2023, the Fire Department had 38 open roles out of 425 [22]. That isn’t as shocking as the rate in Public Works or Emergency Comms, but it has still caused issues like fast turnover and heavy overtime. “[Durham Fire Chief Robert] Zoldos says out of the 35 people who left this year, seven went to other departments, 10 went to other fields, eight moved out of the area and 10 retired or were dismissed for other reasons.” — Spectrum News 1, August 2023 [22] During COVID, Fire Department spending on overtime pay went up dramatically. In FY19–20, $560,000 was spent on overtime pay. That number spiked to $1.3 million in FY20–21 [23]. The overtime bonanza may be softening the issue of low pay, but heavy overtime takes a toll on family life, making the job unattractive to many. Furthermore, the City Council decision to withhold raises makes no sense if the money is spent on overtime anyway. “[We] asked [Durham] where in the budget they found the money to pay for the overtime. The [city] said they used the money they had saved from having so many vacancies.” — WRAL News, July 2022 Close Annual raises for Durham city workers were skipped in FY20–21, unusually low in FY21–22, and below the rate of inflation in FY22–23. During the period of wage austerity, the City Council added tens of millions of dollars to the city’s rainy day fund. As a result, several city departments have been plunged into dysfunction. Solid Waste, Emergency Comms, and others are plagued by issues like labor unrest, heavy overtime, fast turnover, high vacancy rates and more. A progressive coalition is pushing the City Council to raise city workers’ pay to at least $25 per hour in the FY24–25 budget. Get involved with the campaign by following these groups on social media or subscribing to their newsletters: UE Local 150 Southern Workers Assembly Union of Southern Service Workers Work Cited 1. US Inflation Calculator. “Current US Inflation Rates: 2000–2024.” US Inflation Calculator | Easily Calculate How the Buying Power of the U.S. Dollar Has Changed From 1913 to 2023. Get Inflation Rates and U.S. Inflation News., 12 Mar. 2024, www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates. 2. Elk, Mike. “Durham Public Works Employees Illegally Strike for 1st Time.” Payday Report, 6 Sept. 2023, paydayreport.com/durham-public-works-employees-illegally-strike-for-1st-time. 3. Durham’s Adopted Budgets, FY16–17 until FY23–34 3a. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2016–2017.” www.durhamnc.gov, 20 June 2016, www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11260/Budget-book-pages-for-web?bidId= 3b. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2017–2018.” www.durhamnc.gov, 19 June 2017, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15890/FY-2017-2018-Budget-PDF?bidId= 3c. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2018–2019.” www.durhamnc.gov, 18 June 2018, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22131/FY-2018-19-Adopted-Budget 3d. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2019–2020.” www.durhamnc.gov, 17 June 2019, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/27412/FY20-Final-Budget 3e. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2020–2021.” www.durhamnc.gov, 15 June 2020, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/32352/FY21-Final-Budget-Book?bidId= 3f. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2021–2022.” www.durhamnc.gov, 21 June 2021, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/39290/FY22-Adopted-Budget-Book?bidId= 3g. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2022–2023.” www.durhamnc.gov, 16 May 2022, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/46235/Final-FY23-Budget-Book 3h. City of Durham Finance Department. “City of Durham, North Carolina Budget Fiscal Year 2023–2024.” www.durhamnc.gov, 15 May 2023, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/52197/Fiscal-Year-2023-24-Adopted-Budget 4. Moore, Mary Helen. “Durham’s Budget Passes at Fiery Meeting. What Each City Council Member Had to Say. Read More at: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article276583981.html#storylink=cpy.” www.newsobserver.com, 21 June 2023, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article276583981.html. 5. Carroll, Ben. “North Carolina Sanitation Workers Strike for $5K Bonuses.” Labor Notes, 6 Oct. 2023, labornotes.org/2023/10/north-carolina-sanitation-workers-strike-5k-bonuses. 6. An Inside Look at Durham 911 | Durham, NC. www.durhamnc.gov/3964/Durham-911-Stats-Updates#data. 7. Durham Police Data, Statistics, and Reports | Durham, NC. www.durhamnc.gov/4743/Durham-Police-Data-Statistics-and-Report. 8. Fall 2023 City Employee Compensation and Solid Waste Collections Update | Durham, NC. www.durhamnc.gov/5134/Fall-2023-City-Employee-Compensation-and. 9. Panetta, Kyleigh. “Durham Firefighter Advocates for Higher Pay as City Launches Compensation Study.” Spectrum News 1 Charlotte, 23 Aug. 2023, spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/charlotte/news/2023/08/23/durham-firefighter-advocating-for-higher-pay-as-city-works-on-compensation-study. 10. Durham’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, FY21–22 and FY-22–23 10a. City of Durham Finance Department. “Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, City of Durham North Carolina, for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022.” www.durhamnc.gov, 11 Nov. 2022, https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/47665/Annual-Comprehensive-Financial-Report-2022. 10b. City of Durham Finance Department. “Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, City of Durham North Carolina, for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023.” www.durhamnc.gov, 15 Nov. 2023, www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/53560/CITY-OF-DURHAM-FY23-ACFR---FINAL. 11. Moore, Mary Helen. “Garbage Workers Strike for Third Day; Durham Residents Told to Keep Trash on the Curb.” www.newsobserver.com, 12 Sept. 2023, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article279063974.html. 12. Moore, Mary Helen. “City Workers Declare Victory After Durham OKs Bonuses. Here’s What They’ll Get.” www.newsobserver.com, 5 Oct. 2023, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article280117114.html. 13. HEART Program — Participedia. 28 June 2022, participedia.net/case/12955. 14. Durham City Workers Deserve $5000 Bonus and Respect! | Southern Vision Alliance PowerBase. southernvision.ourpowerbase.net/civicrm/petition/sign?sid=93&reset=1. 15. Blackwell, Penelope. “‘Seconds Save Lives.’ but for Some Durham 911 Callers, the Seconds Are Adding Up.” Raleigh News and Observer, 1 Sept. 2021, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article253797173.html. 16. “Unanswered 911 calls and ‘the kind of scream that makes your soul shake.’” Raleigh News and Observer, 19 Aug. 2021, www.newsobserver.com/news/local/crime/article253622368.html. 17. Krueger, Sarah, et al. “Nearly Half 911 Operational Positions Are Vacant in Durham.” WRAL.com, 5 Jan. 2023, www.wral.com/story/nearly-half-911-operational-positions-are-vacant-in-durham/20656403. 18. Living Wage Calculator — Living Wage Calculation for Durham County, North Carolina. livingwage.mit.edu/counties/37063. 19. Price, Crystal. “Durham 911 employees are leaving at 4 times the rate of other dispatch centers nationwide, new audit shows.” CBS 17, 18 July 2022, www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/durham-911-employees-are-leaving-at-4-times-the-rate-of-other-dispatch-centers-nationwide-new-audit-shows. 20. “Durham Firefighters Urge City Council to Increase Pay, Say They Can’t Afford to Live in City.” ABC11 Raleigh-Durham, 8 June 2023, abc11.com/durham-firefighters-firefighter-pay-city-council/13356375. 21. Bergin, Mark, and Monica Casey. “Durham Firefighter Union Chief: Pay Raises ‘anything but a Victory.’” WRAL.com, 21 June 2023, www.wral.com/story/durham-firefighter-union-chief-pay-raises-anything-but-a-victory/20919869. 22. “Durham Firefighter Advocates for Higher Pay as City Launches Compensation Study.” Spectrum News 1 Charlotte, 23 Aug. 2023, spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/charlotte/news/2023/08/23/durham-firefighter-advocating-for-higher-pay-as-city-works-on-compensation-study. 23. Krueger, Sarah, Mark Bergin, et al. “Durham, Raleigh Fire Departments Spend Combined $5.1 Million in Overtime Pay During Past Year.” WRAL.com, 2 July 2022, www.wral.com/story/durham-raleigh-fire-departments-spend-combined-5-1-million-in-overtime-pay-during-past-year/20357138.
- More Proof that Duke Energy Leaders Hate Renewable Power
Image credit: IndyWeek [1] Despite a years-long campaign to greenwash its corporate image by misleading the news media and decision-makers, Duke Energy remains a leading driver of the global climate crisis and is expanding fossil fuels while undermining clean energy solutions. The latest evidence is data NC WARN’s attorney and engineer obtained during the “discovery” phase of the ongoing challenge to Duke’s latest (pro) Carbon Plan proposal. That plan is Duke’s projection of future power generation, and the NC Utilities Commission is supposed to subject it to rigorous open debate by multiple parties and meaningful input by the public. Image credit: Duke Energy [2, pg. 30] The data NC WARN found show that Duke won’t even begin choosing bids for its much-touted solar expansion until at least 2028 [3]. Construction would apparently begin sometime later, then increase for a few years before reverting to very low levels again by 2037 (just 525 MW) and beyond, according to Duke’s projections in the 2023 (pro) Carbon Plan application [2, pg. 81]. Image credit: Duke Energy [2, pg. 81] For several years, North Carolina ranked 2nd nationally in additions of large-scale solar fields, with 1,250 megawatts (MW) added in 2017 [4]. The number plummeted to 250 MW in 2022 due to pro-Duke legislation and a limit on new solar development that Duke sought and received from the NCUC in its 2022 Carbon Plan order. Those legislative and regulatory barriers have fueled uncertainty among solar investors, leading to market stagnation and the loss of dozens of proposed projects; North Carolina’s national solar ranking fell to 13th in 2023 [5]. The Solar Energy Industry Association says NC ranks 23rd in projected growth over the next five years. Image credit: SEIA [5] To amplify the uncertainty, many of the new solar farms Duke Energy is claiming it will later pursue could hinge on Duke leaders’ dreams to pour billions into new or expanded transmission corridors in southeastern NC, where several community groups have already expressed concerns and demanded to know precisely where Duke intends to use eminent domain (land seizure) for new corridors [6]. All this amplifies our belief that Charlotte-based Duke Energy is gradually strangling the companies that build large solar fields, much like it’s done to the companies focusing on rooftop-parking lot solar through its NCUC-sanctioned change to net metering rules. A ruling that could reverse those changes is pending at the NC Court of Appeals [7]. Guaranteed Failure to Help with Climate Crisis So, even if Duke’s high-risk plans for utility-scale solar, experimental nuclear reactors and “hydrogen capable” gas were to succeed as planned, none would provide any meaningful climate benefit until well into the 2030s – much too late for North Carolina to help avert runaway climate-social chaos. Meanwhile, Duke continues expanding construction of methane-leaking, fracked gas burning power plants, hedging against quitting coal and charging ratepayers millions annually to study the possibility of building an as-yet designed nuclear reactor that, at best, might become operational in 2034. State leaders simply must stop Duke Energy from killing the growth of renewables and doubling down in the wrong direction. Local, rooftop-parking lot solar plus storage, matched with well-placed utility-scale solar is the fastest, cheapest – and could be the most equitable way – for North Carolina to help the millions of people already being devastated by climate impacts. This article was published first at NC WARN. Work Cited Billman, Jeffrey. “Trump’s Failing War on Solar Could Hurt North Carolina.” INDY Week, 8 Feb. 2023, indyweek.com/news/archives-news/trump-s-failing-war-solar-hurt-north-carolina. "Carolinas Resource Plan, Appendix C." Duke Energy, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/DukeCPAppendixC.pdf. “Carbon Plan Data Request, NC WARN Request No. 1, Item No. 1-14.” NC WARN, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/CPDataReq.pdf. “State Solar Spotlight.” SEIA, Sept. 2022, www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/North%20Carolina%20State-Factsheet-2022-Q3.pdf. “North Carolina Solar.” SEIA, www.seia.org/state-solar-policy/north-carolina-solar. “84 Solar Companies, Targeted Groups and Allies Call for Investigation of Duke Energy.” NC WARN, 13 Dec. 2023, www.ncwarn.org/2023/12/84-solar-companies-targeted-groups-and-allies-call-for-investigation-of-duke-energy-nc-warn-news-release. “Duke Energy on Defense at NC Court of Appeals Over Regulators’ Agreement to Slash Solar Incentives.” NC WARN & EWG, 13 Feb. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/2024/02/duke-energy-on-defense-at-nc-court-of-appeals-over-regulators-agreement-to-slash-solar-incentives-news-release-from-nc-warn-ewg.
- Durham Union Leaders Meet with Williams and Middleton on Fair Pay
From left to right: Vincent Daniels and Willie Brown (Public Works), Mayor Leonardo Williams, Gerald Woody and Montrell Perry and George Bacote (Solid Waste), Councilman Mark-Anthony Middleton On the first day of Black History Month, February 1, 2024, members of the Durham City Workers Union, UE Local 150, from the Departments of Solid Waste and Public Works met with Mayor Williams and Mayor Pro Tempore Middleton to discuss their demands for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget, to be voted on in June 2024. George Bacote, speaking for sanitation workers, started off the meeting by sharing the difficulties that workers face such as working two jobs and many being unable to afford the skyrocketing rent costs in Durham. Bacote also raised the issue of lengthening routes, which are likely to add even more work on the over-stretched workforce. The union reiterated their demand to raise wages to $25 per hour with a special emphasis on workers in Solid Waste and Public Works, who have been the main workers speaking out and participating in UE Local 150 actions. Workers also demanded that Solid Waste Operators be reclassified to a new job title to recognize the special skills they have beyond being “Maintenance Technicians”. Christopher Benjamin recommended the title of “Sanitation Engineers”. Durham's city government has hired the Logic Consultant Group to put together a compensation study with recommendations on pay for city workers. The City Council does not have a release date, but claims the study should be out in mid-February or March. The city is hosting a Budget Retreat on February 16 and March 1 at Lake Mist from 8:30am - 4:00pm. UE Local 150 is encouraging workers to take off work to attend. The compensation study should be released on that date. During the meeting with Williams and Middleton, workers also reiterated the need to think bigger about where to find tax revenues to fund the needs of workers and the community. This article was published first at UE Local 150
- A Talk with 7 Directions of Service, the Indigenous-led group resisting the Mountain Valley Pipeline
By Lexi Schaffer Crystal (left) and Jason (right) Cavalier-Keck participating in a march. Image credit: 7DS In December 2023, progressives in North Carolina celebrated an announcement by Equitrans Midstream. The corporation’s interstate fracked gas project, the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), would now end in Rockingham County, 30 miles into North Carolina, instead of Alamance County, 70 miles into the state [1]. The subject of a decade’s worth of controversy, the MVP runs 303 miles through Virginia and into northern North Carolina, carving through streams, rivers, forests, and backyards along the way. The proposed section of the MVP that originally planned to reach 70 miles into the state, now reaching only 30 miles, is called the Southgate extension. Green line shows the route of the Southgate extension of the MVP. Image credit: NC Newsline [1] The shortening of the Southgate extension brought joy into the hearts of thousands of North Carolinians who had feared for their land, water, and safety. But the activists behind the success aren’t done. The fight is only just beginning. Building on their partial victory, grassroots groups across North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia are organizing to stop the rest of the Southgate extension and the entire Mountain Valley Pipeline. One of the groups working against the MVP is 7 Directions of Service (7DS), which works to combine Indigenous knowledge with the universal need for clean air and water — a united front for environmental justice. Sunrise Durham sat down for an interview with prominent 7DS leaders Jason Campos-Keck and Coda Cavalier-Keck. Jason co-founded the organization with his partner Crystal Cavalier, an award-winning Indigenous leader. Their child Coda, the Native Youth Organizer for 7DS, is also an influential environmental activist. Crystal, Jason and Coda have worked to turn 7DS into the capable organization that spearheaded Alamance County’s successful expulsion of the pipeline. Jason recalled that the 7DS was “originally a nonprofit called Eastern Woodland Lacrosse” that “offered free stickball to the neighborhood.” Before stickball games, Jason’s players “would do water ceremonies to prepare for the game” in the Haw River, which is sacred to indigenous communities. The Haw flows through six North Carolina counties, including Rockingham and Alamance, providing natural beauty and vital resources such as fish and clean water [2]. MVP ditch behind a home in Virginia. Image credit: Bloomberg In 2018, the Cavalier-Kecks learned that the proposed Southgate extension would cut straight through the Haw River and “cross many streams in the Haw River watershed” [3]. The family and much of the community were appalled. As Crystal and Jason dug deeper into the issue, they were astounded by what they found. If built, the originally proposed Southgate extension “would have crossed 207 streams, three ponds and temporarily damaged 17,726 linear feet of streams, 6,538 square feet of open waters, and 14 acres of wetlands” in addition to cutting through private property [1,4]. The pipeline “threatens air, it threatens land, it threatens animals, it threatens people,” said Jason. It especially “threatens water, because there is no replenishing supply of fresh water once humans have damaged it,” and a proposed filtration system is expensive and “only helps the two legged people. It doesn’t help the fish swimming in it, doesn’t help the insects, doesn’t help the turtles, the birds eating those fish.” Coda added that “once the fish get poisoned, it’s only a matter of time before” people eat the fish, meaning that any water contamination from the pipeline could prove deadly, with or without a filtration system. 7DS leads a demonstration. Image credit: 7DS Furthermore, Southgate would cut through vulnerable ecosystems previously shielded from extensive human contact by mountains and dangerous terrain. The pipeline also runs through an area that has been “a traditional indigenous trading path for hundreds of years,” explained Jason, making the project a threat to local heritage. In addition to tearing through previously undisturbed land, the Mountain Valley Pipeline endangers local plants and animals that have lived alongside humans in the area for thousands of years. The project is predicted to drive local fish species such as the Roanoke Logperch and Candy Darter to near-extinction [5]. To protect these animals, activists have appealed to laws that protect endangered species to hinder the progress of Equitrans Midstream. “Hunting and fishing alone is not going to deplete the populations of these species,” said Jason. “Fossil fuel extraction certainly will.” Roanoke Logperch. Image credit: Conservation Fisheries / Candy Darter. Image credit: National Park Service The MVP deepens environmental injustices along its route. The Southgate extension “would require a massive, polluting compressor station in a predominately Black community near Chatham, VA” [6]. The pipeline would fuel climate change, emitting an astonishing 89 million metric tons of annual greenhouse gas emissions, the equivalent of 26 coal plants or 19 million passenger vehicles [7]. Jason remembered that Crystal “was an elected tribal official at the time” when they learned of the Southgate extension. When she brought the issue “to her council, . . . they basically told her that she could not speak out.” Frustrated, she resigned “so that she could advocate on the community’s behalf.” Crystal and Jason began organizing and mobilizing against the MVP full-time, gathering the support of their peers and the larger community through their roots in Eastern Woodland Lacrosse. They decided to give the organization a new name: 7 Directions of Service. The seven directions are “children, women, men, elders, the earth, the sky (which is also symbolic of culture and the mind) and finally, the direction within” [6]. These values have guided the Cavalier-Kecks and other activists in their work against Southgate and the MVP. Drawing upon principles of inclusivity, 7DS brought together activist groups from around North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia “as one united front” against the pipeline, said Jason. People “have a responsibility and to show solidarity and support with our neighbors, no matter . . . where they are, whether they’re in North Carolina or up in West Virginia and Virginia.” Protestors hold an anti-pipeline banner. Image credit: WSLS 10 Once united, the groups worked closely together to mobilize people against Southgate. Jason said “we go politically, we’ve gone to the Pentagon, we’ve gone to the United Nations, we’ve gone to the White House itself.” In February 2024, 7DS filed a Human Rights appeal to the United Nations claiming that the MVP violates Articles 11, 26, and 29 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples [8]. 7DS also encourages its members to contact local and national politicians, in order to spur widespread legislative progress. Despite the group’s political persistence, Jason noted that the most challenging part has been “negotiating with elected officials, regulating people like the EPA, the FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), and the Army Corps of Engineers, those people who are supposed to listen to our concerns and make changes.” In his experience, government officials are quick to find loopholes and develop new policies to get around hurdles created by activists, a heartbreaking cycle of progress and setbacks. Jason pointed out an “incentive by government to enable these corporations, regardless if they’re a responsible corporation or a predatory one, like the MVP,’’ that uses “disingenuous and dishonest practices” to force communities into compliance. Fossil fuel companies running roughshod over indigenous land doesn’t just happen in North Carolina. Energy corporations across the nation have broken through activists’ defenses to build disruptive, greenhouse gas-emitting pipelines. For example, the infamous Dakota Access Pipeline threatens the land of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and other indigenous populations in the Dakotas. Demonstrators protest the Dakota Access Pipeline. Image credit: The Daily Northwestern Instead of waiting for delayed government responses and gradual policy change, 7DS organizes public rallies and speeches to press for political change. Jason recalled, “we’ve done civil disobedience, which looks like marches, what they call protests in the media, but we call those protects, not protests.” Coda said that their most effective “community advocacy strategies” have been “art builds, sharing meals together . . . just showing up and gathering support from the community.” They reflected that “support in strength of numbers” shows resilience and determination, two qualities that passionate North Carolinians have fully exhibited in their ongoing fight against the pipeline. Jason and Coda said that, just as the brave “Standing Rock . . folks have not given up,” the people of this state are already to resist Southgate through political and civil means to protect their land and safety, “no matter what happens or what the MVP announces.” Image credit: Jan Burger of Paperhand Puppet Intervention After their victory in reducing Southgate’s reach in December of 2023, 7DS is now mobilizing citizens in Rockingham County, the pipeline’s new ending location. Sunrise Durham asked how people living in North Carolina can help, and Jason and Coda emphasized that anyone, including non-activists, can join the campaign to push back against the pipeline and protect North Carolina’s land, water, plants, and living beings. Coda suggested “following [7 Directions of Service] on social media”. That allows people to receive updates and get involved by coming to events. “There is always some way that you can help out,” they said, “whether it’s by donating or just showing up and supporting even for . . . an hour, a few minutes, just doing something to show solidarity.” Additionally, they said that people can contribute by “calling your politicians, emailing them, reaching out, doing something that you can do within your power” and time, whatever that may be. Simply spreading awareness by speaking to loved ones about the issue will bring attention to injustices that are currently being swept under the rug. “We would love any support,” Jason said, “even if it’s sitting at home sending an email saying, we don’t like this. There’s got to be a better way.” Protesters unite against the MVP. Image credit: In These Times “Welcome to North Carolina,” Jason said when asked about newcomers to the state. “Not only have you moved to one of the largest populations of indigenous tribes in the country East of the Mississippi, you’ve moved to the home of the civil rights movement.” He commented that North Carolina is “the home of the first environmental justice movement, which was . . . near Halifax County, North Carolina, where corporations were trying to poison a small farming community and they rose up and resisted. I would invite you to do your homework on the local indigenous population.” In this state of diverse social movements and sacred land, we can achieve change and protection if we all work together. Organizations like 7DS are leading the charge, acting as spokespeople for all living beings, human and nonhuman. “Environmental rights are rights for every living thing,” Jason said. “We all have to drink water and breathe air, so we might as well drink clean water and breathe clean air and fight to have the most basic human rights.” Works Cited 1. Sorg, Lisa. “MVP Southgate Natural Gas Pipeline Will No Longer Cross Alamance County.” NC Newsline, 2 Jan. 2024, ncnewsline.com/2024/01/02/mvp-southgate-natural-gas-pipeline-will-no-longer-cross-alamance-county/. 2. “Haw River — Guilford/Rockingham/Alamance Counties.” Piedmont Land Conservancy, 5 Oct. 2015, https://www.piedmontland.org/protected-places/clean-water/upper-haw-river/. 3. “Mountain Valley Pipeline Proposal: Haw River Assembly.” Haw River Assembly | Defending the River since 1982, 6 June 2023, hawriver.org/river-issues/mvpsouthgate/ #:~:text =Effects%20on%20the%20Haw&text=The%20pipeline%20will%20cross%20many,stream%20crossings%20leave%20streams%20devastated. 4. “Letter From NC Department of Environmental Quality to US Army Corps of Engineers About Mountain Valley Pipeline.” NC DEQ, 23 Sept. 2019, edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?id=990879&dbid=0&repo=WaterResources&cr=1. 5. “Federal Court Stays Mountain Valley Pipeline’s Biological Opinion Again.” Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity, 11 July 2023, https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/federal-court-stays-mountain-valley-pipelines-biological-opinion-again-2023-07-11/ 6. “Our Core Initiatives.” 7 Directions of Service, https://7directionsofservice.com/core-initiatives. Accessed 2 Mar. 2024. 7. “The Mountain Valley Pipeline: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Briefing” https://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2017/02/mountain_valley_pipe_web_final_v1.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar. 2024. 8. “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”. United Nations, 13 Sept. 2007, www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf.
- Durham Gets Ready to Celebrate the Other Labor Day
Trade unions, environmental groups, and left-wing parties are preparing to rally and march in central Durham on May 1st, 2024 to celebrate International Workers Day [1]. The May Day rally is being organized by Durham Workers Assembly, United for a Fair Economy, Raising Wages NC, UE Local 150, and other groups. The rest of the world celebrates May 1st as a worker’s holiday. The day was chosen to honor of the victims of the 1886 Haymarket Massacre in Chicago, where four demonstrators were killed by police during a rally for an eight-hour work day. In the US, May 1st is designated as Law Day. “Attacks on workers’ standard of living and working conditions have intensified. During the COVID-19 pandemic, employers made record profits at our collective expense,” the organizers of the May Day wrote in a statement, “Our labor continues to be stolen and used to fund increasingly brutal police and military forces across the planet, all while the costs of living climbs higher and higher.” Haymarket Massacre in Chicago. Image credit: Illinois Labor History Society The May Day rally and march will put forward four demands and themes: 1. Local minimum wage of $25 per hour for all workers, particularly for city workers. Only the state government can raise the overall minimum wage, while the City Council controls the pay of city workers. These bodies are only likely to act if trade unions press for better pay and conditions. 2. Measures to make housing more affordable. Various state laws make it almost impossible to pursue the normal methods for creating affordable housing - rent control and public housing. In North Carolina, rent control is illegal under GS 42‑14.1 [2]. Cities in North Carolina are allowed to create public housing, but only for a low-income market that the private sector has no interest in. The state government is similarly bound, unable to help create affordable housing for the majority of the population due to a 1939 state law called the Umstead Act that bars the state government from competing with the private sector [3]. 3. Payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) from Duke University. The university owns at least $1.7 billion of property but pays only $3.7 million in property taxes, since most of their properties are tax exempt [4 , 5]. However, universities across the US such as Yale and UPenn make voluntary PILOTs worth tens of millions of dollars per year [6, 7]. 4. Support for the Palestinian people with a call for a ceasefire in Gaza and divestment from Israel, as well as a demand to reallocate military funds to social needs. In February 2024, Durham’s City Council passed a resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza by a vote of 5-2, with Mayor Pro Tem Mark Antony-Middleton and Mayor Leonardo Williams voting against. During the City Council debate, Mayor Williams said that “ignorance is not always intentional, so I ask for your grace” before voting against the resolution [8, 5:45:47]. The other vote against the resolution was Mayor Pro Tem Middleton, who commented during the debate that in 2023 he’d been on a trip to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Knesset [8, 5:24:03]. Ceasefire event at Durham City Council. Image credit: Leslie St. Dre / IndyWeek The May Day event hopes to help change a grim status quo for workers in North Carolina. According to Oxfam America, the state holds the 2023 title for “worst state to work in” and “last place position in the Working Women index”. The low ranking is based on North Carolina's $7.25 minimum wage, lack of paid leave, and “right-to-work” laws that undermine the finances of trade unions (and do not guarantee employment) [9]. North Carolina has a unionization rate of 3.6 percent, slightly lower than the 67 percent rate of Denmark but trouncing the 2.7 percent rate of South Carolina. The May Day statement said that “the city of Durham has the highest eviction rate in the state.” EvictionLab numbers run out in 2016 when the city had an eviction rate of 5.2 percent per year, ranked sixth out of nine tracked cities [10]. According to DataWorks, Durham’s eviction rate rose to 9.4 percent during the 2016-2020 period [11, pg. 8]. During that time, the eviction rate for Black people was 15.8 percent, triple the rate of any other group. The data show the source of the anguished pleas to alleviate “gentrification” heard every election cycle in Durham. 2020 photo of Lutrenda Sumpter, who has dealt with multiple Durham Housing Authority eviction filings. Image credit: Maydha Devarajan / Durham Voice A mini awakening of Durham’s working class will be on display at the May 1st event. Old unions are stronger and new unions have appeared. The groups that will march from CCB Plaza include “Durham city workers (UE Local 150), school workers (Durham Association of Educators), Duke graduate workers (DGSU), Starbucks workers (SBWU), Amazon workers (CAUSE), REI workers (UFCW), Waffle House workers (USSW)”. In August 2023, graduate workers at Duke University won their NLRB election by an astonishing vote of 1000-131. That victory turned the DGSU into the largest union of graduate workers at a private university in the South [12]. Image credit: DGSU / The Nation In a lesser-known development from 2023, the Starbucks on Fayetteville Road voted 16-2 to unionize with SBWU, joining a wave of 420 stores across the US [13]. Recently, the store’s workers called for community help when managers cut the hours of pro-union baristas to as low as four hours per pay period. The May Day march and rally has been endorsed by dozens of groups including 7 Directions of Service, Black Workers for Justice, NC Environmental Justice Network, and Jubilee Baptist Church. The organizers have encouraged community members and groups to RSVP and endorse the May 1st event with this form. People looking to keep track of updates should follow the social media accounts of Durham Workers Assembly. Work Cited 1. May Day 2024 - Durham Endorsement and Interest Form. actionnetwork.org/forms/may-day-2024-durham-endorsement-interest-form. 2. “GS 42‑14.1. Rent Control.” NC Legislature, www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_42/GS_42-14.1.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr. 2024. 3. Mulligan, Tyler. Local Government Support for Privately Owned Affordable Housing | Community and Economic Development - Blog by UNC School of Government. 16 May 2022, ced.sog.unc.edu/2022/05/local-government-support-for-privately-owned-affordable-housing. 4. Burness, John. “Dismiss Durham'S Idea to Tax Duke'S Dime.” The Chronicle, 15 Apr. 1998, www.dukechronicle.com/article/dismiss-durhams-idea-tax-dukes-dime. 5. Mungai, Mary. Durham City Councilman Proposes Duke Pay “Fair Share” in Property Taxes | the Durham VOICE. 14 Mar. 2024, durhamvoice.org/durham-city-councilman-proposes-duke-pay-fair-share-in-property-taxes. 6. Basler, Cassandra. “Yale Announces ‘Historic’ $135 Million Payment to New Haven.” Connecticut Public, 9 Mar. 2023, www.ctpublic.org/education-news/2021-11-17/yale-announces-historic-135-million-payment-to-new-haven. 7. Stellino, Molly. “Activists Question Whether Wealthy Universities Should Be Exempt From Property Taxes.” The Hechinger Report, 18 Dec. 2020, hechingerreport.org/activists-question-whether-wealthy-universities-should-be-exempt-from-property-taxes. 8. City of Durham NC. “Durham City Council Feb 19 2024.” YouTube, 20 Feb. 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwgMfJf8bp4. 9. Work in America: The Best and Worst States in 2023. 30 Aug. 2023, www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/stories/best-worst-states-work-us-2023. 10. “Eviction Rankings.” Eviction Lab, evictionlab.org/rankings/#/evictions?r=North%20Carolina&a=0&d=evictionRate&lang=en. 11. DataWorks. Tenant Demographics and Eviction Filings in Durham County. 2023, dataworks-nc.org/wp-content/uploads/Tenant-Demographics-and-Eviction-Filings-in-Durham-County.pdf. 12. Schlemmer, Liz. “Duke University Graduate Students Win Union Election in a Landslide.” WUNC, 22 Aug. 2023, www.wunc.org/news/2023-08-22/duke-university-graduate-students-win-union-election-in-a-landslide. 13. Cranford, Claire. “‘Starbucks Works Because We Work’: Inside the Formation of Durham’s First Starbucks Union.” The Chronicle, 12 Jan. 2024, www.dukechronicle.com/article/2024/01/duke-university-starbucks-durham-union-formation.
- ‘We’ve Gotten Used to a Nightmare:’ Durham Development Pollutes, Damages Property
By Emily Chambliss Durham County resident Susanna Strasser speaks about her experiences with construction and development. Image credit: Pam Andrews with Preserve Rural Durham. In 2022, a few weeks before Thanksgiving, Susanna Strasser put framed family photos in her new rental home while the walls shook around her. The floor vibrated beneath her feet, and the few belongings she brought into the home rattled in their boxes. Smoke drifted through her backyard from the construction site behind the 1300 block of Junction Road in Durham, N.C. Construction in the area was nothing new, so Strasser paid it no mind. But weeks later, when dark brown, sour-smelling water poured from her faucet, she knew something was wrong. ー As the fifth largest county in North Carolina, Durham County saw over 25% population growth in the last 14 years, welcoming over 60,000 new residents in that time. To accommodate this growth, the city plans to expand into rural Durham. In November, the Durham City Council voted in favor of amendments to the Simplified Code for Affordable Housing. The code removed many barriers to development, and opponents claimed it encouraged gentrification of the area. Urban developers can acquire farmland and forests in Durham County, and petition the city for voluntary annexation of the land into the city. In November, the city council approved the controversial Perry Farm project, allowing McAdams civil engineering firm to convert 280-plus acres of forested land into 665 new residential units in southeast Durham. In the firm’s rezoning application, it designated 3 percent of the units as affordable housing at 80 percent area median income for 30 years. This is less than 20 affordable units for low-income residents. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, a family of four is considered low-income if they bring in less than $30,000 a year. Buyers at 80 percent AMI in Durham would make about $76,000 a year for a family of four. “Public officials and developers want growth in Durham,” Pamela Andrews, founder of Preserve Rural Durham, said. “They want the money. They want the taxes. They don’t care about anything else.” With Durham’s population expected to increase by over 100,000 in the next 20 years, the city council and the Durham Board of County Commissioners have promoted high density housing as a way for all Durham residents to live affordably in the area. High density housing, like apartments and townhomes, increases pollution and pressure on the natural environment. High density development strips land of trees, roots and other vegetation. Deforestation and infrastructure expansion increase the risk of severe flooding and create urban “heat islands.” Structures like roads and buildings re-emit heat from the sun at a higher rate than natural landscapes. These “heat islands” contribute to higher daytime temperatures and increased air pollution. Environmental concerns continue to grow as new annexations push city boundaries further into Durham County. “We need a promise from Durham that they’re going to protect our waters and our environment,” Samantha Krop, Neuse riverkeeper and director of advocacy at grassroots organization Sound Rivers said. “And we don’t have that right now.” During construction, developers blast away rocks to make room for the concrete slab foundations houses are built on. Uncontrolled blasting can produce structural damage to neighboring buildings and structures. The city of Durham has strict blasting regulations, requiring the notification of nearby residents and a safety plan. Durham County does not require either. This construction can also contribute to water pollution from metals, chemicals and sediment eroded by deforestation, blasting and drilling. On Sept. 7, the Southern Environmental Law Center filed a lawsuit on behalf of grassroots organization Sound Rivers to stop ongoing pollution into Martin Branch Creek, which connects into major drinking water source Falls Lake. The lawsuit alleges Clayton Properties Group, Inc. has committed more than 16 Clean Water Act violations in its development in southeast Durham. Water samples collected by Krop show the developer has discharged sediment into the creek at over 20 times over permit limit. This excess sediment has turned creek water bright orange. The SELC notified Clayton Properties Group of their intent to sue in May 2023, but the lawsuit claims water samples collected 60 days after notification “confirmed” ongoing violations. “We weren’t receiving the response we were hoping for in terms of stopping the pollution,” Krop said. “We’re hoping to encourage developers to value and protect our creeks. We believe we can have responsible development that provides housing that Durham needs while also protecting its water resources.” Krop said Durham’s environmental issues come down to a lack of development oversight, and insufficient regulation enforcement. In October, Sound Rivers filed a lawsuit against Mungo Homes, claiming the development company violated the Clean Water Act over 20 times as it builds homes along Olive Branch Road. “What has happened to Durham that we don’t care about our water systems?” Andrews said. “That used to be taboo. It makes no sense.” Much of Durham falls into critical watersheds, or areas where water supply protection is considered crucial, like Falls Lake and Jordan Lake. Durham developers have, according to the Sound Rivers lawsuits, polluted essential sources of water for drinking, irrigation, flood control or hydroelectric projects. Susanna Strasser, who said she has been without clean water since November 2022, claims excessive construction and development is the cause. ー On the 1300 block of Junction Road, near Walmart Supercenter and Glenn Elementary School, many homes have been without clean water since their wells failed around Thanksgiving 2022. Preserve Rural Durham and residents of the area said the issues started weeks after local developer KB Homes blasted rock behind their homes. Strasser noticed weak water pressure and a “horrible” smell she described as rotten eggs. The water came out of sinks and showers a dark brown. Strasser tried using a water filter, but said it did not last a day. Residents believe the nearby blasting collapsed their wells and ruptured surrounding sewer lines, contaminating their remaining water supply. Despite efforts from landlord Elmo Yancey, little has been done to mitigate the issue. “The county [does] not care what’s happening. The city [does] not care what’s happening,” Strasser said. “We don’t have the money for them to care.” Residents can only use the water for the toilet. They have been purchasing bottled water or collecting rainwater for cleaning, showering, cooking and drinking. Lludiz Velazquez said her daughter complained of dry, itchy skin and rashes before halting showering in the well water. “I’m sure it was that terrible, nasty water,” she said. Several neighbors reported the same issue. Now, Velazquez and her family buy water from Walmart, heat it on the stove and pour water on themselves from a container as they sit on a medical shower chair. The family stopped showering every day, reducing to twice a week. “We will shower three times if we can afford it,” Velazquez said. She said it embarrasses her daughter at school to be without water, and that she gets excited to use an actual shower when staying with family. “She’ll say ‘Mommy I wish we can move to another house,’ I say ‘We cannot afford to live in another house,’” Velazquez said. Velazquez collects rainwater for dishes and buys the rest in gallon jugs. According to a study by DigDeep, a nonprofit aimed at improving universal clean water access, purchasing drinking water costs a family an average of $1,350 a year, or about $112.50 per month. The average water bill in Durham comes out to approximately $40 a month for 5,000 gallons of water for all uses. The DigDeep study states households without adequate water and sanitation access spend over $15,000 a year on healthcare costs and other related expenses. Seventy-nine year old Strasser said the water has deteriorated her health. “I have to eat out every day. I can’t lift the water I bought from the store. I can’t always get to my son’s house to use his water, especially when it’s cold,” she said. “So I don’t know what I’m supposed to do.” In May 2023, Durham County provided a tanker truck to supply water to the homes with failed wells. Residents said there wasn’t enough water for everyone. In November, the county removed the tanker without providing a permanent solution. A few days before the removal of the tanker, Strasser said she received a bill for the water because it was on her property. She said the bill charged her $500 per day. “I don’t know where they think I am going to get that money,” Strasser said. “The people who did the damage haven’t had to pay nothing,” The Durham Voice reached out to Durham County about the issue, but received no response. Few options remain for Junction Road residents to regain access to safe water. The property owners can petition for annexation of the area into the city of Durham and petition for an extension of the city’s water services. Or, they can petition for annexation and extend the water line at their own cost. It can take weeks to months to design, assess and install any kind of water line extension. Velazquez reached out to the Durham City Council about a quicker solution. She said city council members expressed interest in solving the issue; even going as far as to visit the Junction Road homes for themselves. Velazquez has not heard from any council members since, despite several attempts to contact them. “Lot’s of promises. Lot’s of hope,” she said. “But still there is nothing.” Almost a year and a half after their wells failed, residents of Junction Road have not found a solution. Renters and property owners continue to hope the issue will soon be resolved. “Nobody is fighting for us. We are the only ones fighting for us,” Velazquez said. “It’s been a nightmare. But we’ve gotten used to a nightmare.” Edited by Phillip Le This article was published first in The Durham Voice
- From the Sky, Riverkeepers Eye Moriah Energy Center Site and Other Pollution Sources
An aerial view of the Moriah Energy Center in Person County shows 74 acres of clearcut land which is now impacting local creeks. Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop and Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman took to the air last week to check in on several pollution concerns in the upper Neuse and Tar-Pamlico watersheds. From the air, they took in Dominion’s Moriah Energy Center, currently under construction in Person County, the Upper Piedmont landfill near Roxboro, and a number of development sites in the Lick Creek watershed. “The most notable thing we saw was that the Moriah Energy Center has completed the initial land-clearing phase of construction, and all trees have been removed from the construction site,” Sam said. “It was alarming to see the vast swath of barren land where there used to be forest — seeing it all from above really puts into perspective how significant 74 acres of clearcut land is.” Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop, Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman and SouthWings pilot Rolf Wallin mid-flight. Though no water quality permits were required for the MEC project, because the facility will not encroach on the network of streams and wetlands on the site, Sam, with the help of landowners adjacent to the site, has been tracking sediment runoff into those streams. “Recent turbidity samples taken after this past weekend’s rains found levels of turbidity in receiving creeks, downstream of the facility, at 110 and 750NTU, respectively. That’s over twice and 15 times the state standard. The creek that was at 110NTU this weekend, after around .5 inches of rain, was just 10NTU after roughly 1.5 inches of rain in March, before all of the land clearing was complete,” she said. “If Dominion’s sediment and erosion control practices were working, we would not be seeing this elevated sediment in creeks next to the construction site, where these creeks ran clear in the past. Now more than ever, it is critical for locals to keep an eye out for sediment and erosion control violations on this site, especially sediment leaving the site, and to report violations to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources when seen.” In the Upper Tar River watershed, Katey has been keeping tabs on the Upper Piedmont Landfill since September of last year, when Sound Rivers received a report of discolored, murky water on Cub Creek, which is downstream of the landfill. An aerial view of the Upper Piedmont Landfill near Roxboro, in the upper Tar River watershed. The aerial surveillance came courtesy of SouthWings and volunteer pilot Rolf Wallin. SouthWings partners with conservation groups, community groups, media and decision-makers to provide a unique perspective to better understand and solve pressing environmental issues in the Southeast. For more information, visit southwings.org. This article was published first in Sound Rivers Sediment runoff from a housing development impacts an adjacent wetland in the Lick Creek watershed.
- Sweeping New Solar Plus Storage Proposal for North Carolina
Climate non-profit NC WARN tells state leaders to end suppression of local solar, says that all customers can benefit by sharing solar costs through the rate system With the global climate crisis at a point of desperation, power bills soaring and Duke Energy stifling renewables while aggressively expanding fossil fuels, clean energy group NC WARN and allies are calling for state leaders to finally consider – instead of suppressing – the fastest, cheapest and most equitable way to phase out climate-wrecking power plants. At a press conference today, NC WARN proposed a major shift for the state [1]. The 36-year-old nonprofit says the costs and benefits of local solar-plus-storage (SPS) – including lower power bills – should be shared by all customers the same way we all pay for polluting power. There would be no up-front cost, plus financial incentives for adding solar power and battery storage on homes, businesses and others. Today NC WARN released a two-page summary of its "Sharing Solar" proposal [2]. It says locating solar panels and storage batteries where power is used, particularly rooftops and parking areas, will generate jobs in towns and cities across the state, add protections during emergencies, and help all customers avoid annual rate increases while reducing climate pollution instead of expanding fossil fuels. The proposal calls for prioritizing low-income customers. NC WARN will soon file engineer Konidena’s testimony critical of Duke’s proposed Carbon Plan for gambling on high-risk, climate-wrecking approaches for future power generation. He also explains how other utilities are using solar-plus-storage to create “virtual power plants” that help phase out fossil fuels and save millions. The NCUC already approved Duke Energy’s plans to expand solar power many years from now. Duke assumes this would be larger-than-ever solar farms near rural communities, preceded by billions of dollars in new transmission projects that would drive up the cost of the solar. NC WARN argues that most of it should be local SPS, where the benefits of generating and storing power where it's used could begin right away, expand quickly and be shared statewide. Jim Warren, director of NC WARN said today at a press conference, “A key hindrance for expanding rooftop solar has long been the up-front cost. But NC electricity users don’t pay a large up-front cost to build giant fossil fuel and nuclear power plants. We all share the cost of kilowatt-hours on our monthly power bills, and polls show that, overwhelmingly, North Carolinians and businesses would rather be buying clean power.” Warren said the new proposal will launch a new statewide campaign with clean energy allies to lift up rooftop solar just as Duke tries to bury it. Scores of solar companies and advocacy groups have already called to expand local solar instead of bulldozing farms and forests under Duke’s plan. A verdict is expected by the NC Court of Appeals in a case where NC WARN and allies seek to reverse a ruling that allowed Duke Energy to stunt the economics of rooftop solar. Bobby Jones, President of the Down East Coal Ash Environmental and Social Justice Coalition, said at the press conference that his group is excited about the possibilities of the shared solar proposal. “It’s exactly what we need to address our climate and energy crisis. Right now, we’re at the mercy of the Duke monopoly and its unclean energy … and what they charge us for it. We’re paying for our own demise.” His group is joining NC WARN, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg NAACP and Robeson County’s Seeds of Hope as intervenors in the Carbon Plan docket. The allies will promote local SPS and challenge Duke’s plans for billions in new transmission corridors through disadvantaged rural communities. Duke remains secretive about where it would seek to locate those corridors. Sharing Solar will help all customers avoid constant rate hikes caused by the tens of billions of dollars Duke wants to spend on high-risk power plants and new transmission [3]. SPS also adds much-needed resiliency for all power users – such as emergency facilities – during outages. “Not enough roof space”? Duke Energy and others have long claimed rooftop solar can’t help slow the climate crisis. In fact, North Carolina has twice the practical space needed to meet climate goals on rooftops, parking areas, contaminated brownfields and vacant land close to towns and cities, according to federal data [4, pg. 6]. NC WARN has been proposing SPS since 2017 [5]. With the new payment approach, the group says its way past time for the NC Utilities Commission (NCUC) and Duke Energy to finally agree to a fair consideration of local SPS – especially because Duke can profit from it. Image credit: NC WARN [4, pg. 8] NC WARN says Duke leaders’ “pro-Carbon Plan” would ensure that North Carolina remains a top driver of the climate crisis. Thousands of state residents are still reeling from past superstorms even as scientists warn that the coming hurricane season could be our worst ever. Jim Warren added, “Duke Energy leaders and state officials simply must, finally, break out of the years of appalling pretense that North Carolina is ‘making a clean transition’. The climate situation is desperate, this state is failing its duty, and local solar could quickly begin to change that.” This article was published first in NC WARN. Work Cited NC WARN. “NC WARN Proposes Sweeping New Solar Approach for NC Electricity System.” YouTube, 15 May 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=asCr2BPtqio. “The Quickest, Most Affordable Way to Tackle the Climate Crisis and Cut Power Bills - NC WARN.” NC WARN, 14 May 2024, www.ncwarn.org/sharing-solar-summ. Heilman, Sara. “84 Solar Companies, Targeted Groups and Allies Call for Investigation of Duke Energy — NC WARN News Release.” NC WARN, 13 Dec. 2023, www.ncwarn.org/2023/12/84-solar-companies-targeted-groups-and-allies-call-for-investigation-of-duke-energy-nc-warn-news-release. NC WARN. Moving North Carolina Forward: The Case for Local Solar-Plus-Storage. 26 June 2023, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/MovingNC-Forward.pdf. Powers, Bill. “North Carolina Clean Path 2025: Achieving an Economical Clean Energy Future.” NC WARN, by NC WARN, report, Aug. 2017, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/NC-CLEAN-PATH-2025-FINAL-8-9-17.pdf.